I have never used it. I could see it having a utility for unit testing, but that is it.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > peter royal wrote: >> >> On Nov 6, 2008, at 7:28 AM, Dan Creswell wrote: >>> >>> Hmmm, if VmPipe is done right it should allow me to build an app/service >>> on >>> top of MINA that can easily be tested all inside of a single JVM (good >>> for >>> unit testing amongst other things) or deployed fully networked with >>> minimum >>> code disruption. >>> >>> Is it intended to be used in such a fashion? If not possibly it can be >>> dropped. >> >> I am using it for exactly this purpose. >> >> We have two services that can either be deployed as separate VMs, or >> inside of the same VM. WHen its inside the same VM, we cull out the protocol >> filters and just use a VmPipe. Minimal code disruption to support both >> configurations. > > Interesting. Edouard's proposal then makes sense : implementing the > underlying communication using Queues and removing a lot of the current code > could help. > > You will still have the same API (IoAcceptor/IoConnector), and won't be > disruptive. > > This has to be evaluated. > > > -- > -- > cordialement, regards, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > directory.apache.org > > >
