On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 09:44, Ashish <paliwalash...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> One biggest TODO, is to migrate the code from MINA 1.1.0 to MINA 2.0 >>> A lot has changed since then. >> >> I you or anybody else is happy to dive into it, go ahead. Every ASF >> committer has Labs commit access... ;-) > > Is it?? Never knew that :-) > Or we may freeze the development for a while, till the code is moved > to sandbox, and then > take care of all this.
At some point, we need a freeze. Please let me know when you start IP due dilligence. For the time being, I'd like to continue committing. > Any suggestions ?? If you need a branch at Labs, I'll re-balance the trunk. >> Great! Now it works! Thanks. > >> Is this contributed, ASL-licensed code? ;-) > > Yup It is :-) You'd like to commit it? That'd be great. Otherwise I will do later today. >>> For the compliance package, my expectation shall be a little >>> different. We need to generate a summary report, which states what all >>> we comply to, like a simple pdf. Users can pick it up and can see the >>> compliance easily, rather than browsing all javadocs. Javadocs shall >>> still retain this information. >> >> +1. That'd be a goal for improvement. The current idea is to have an >> easy pointer where in code to find the implementation(s) for a >> specific part of the spec (you already mentioned it, the RFCs are big >> :-). Some section you'd probably never implement, sometimes you have >> to go down to paragraph- or bullet point-level granularity. > > Leave this to me, will take care of it. ok. >>> I guess turning them into JIRA will make things more manageable and we >>> can get a better picture of tasks at hand. > > What's the Lab JIRA URL? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LABS select component 'Vysper' Bernd
