Hi, Agreeing with Edouard it's more like a bug fix, but if it's a problem we can do the deprecation move. Julien
Le Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:26:12 +0000 (GMT), Edouard De Oliveira <[email protected]> a écrit : > > Shall we consider that this filter is part of the Core API ? We also > could consider that this is a necessary change as Mina website states > that 'All classes and methods follow camel notation strictly'. > > No problem with rolling these changes back of course > but my +1 on keeping these > Cordialement, Regards, > -Edouard De Oliveira- > Blog: http://tedorgwp.free.fr > WebSite: http://tedorg.free.fr/en/main.php > > > > ----- Message d'origine ---- > De : Niklas Gustavsson <[email protected]> > À : [email protected] > Envoyé le : Vendredi, 17 Avril 2009, 21h04mn 33s > Objet : Re: svn commit: r766111 > - > /mina/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/mina/filter/logging/LoggingFilter.java > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:24 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > - public LogLevel getExceptionCaughtLoglevel() { > > + public LogLevel getExceptionCaughtLogLevel() { > > This breaks the API, something we promised not to do after M4. Are we > still okay with this change? > > /niklas > > > >
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
