Michael Jakl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 16:25, Bernd Fondermann
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 15:15, Michael Jakl <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Exactly 70% of the server code gets executed when running all tests
>>> (and 83.2% of the test-code is run).
>>>
>>> Quite impressive :)
>> You think so? I always felt that a lot of tests are missing, esp
>> judging from what's in the spec.
>
> Actually I haven't worked on a project with such a high coverage. This
> makes it also a bit harder than expected to add more meaningful tests
> for me since it'd require a more thorough understanding of the RFCs.
>
> If you can think of untested parts of Vysper that you think I will
> need during the implementation of the XEP, please give me a hint.
The whole presence subsription part is largely untested:
PresenceSubscriptionHandler
PresenceAvailabilityHandler
...That's most of 3921.
BTW, maybe we need to enhance SpecCompliant with a enum flag "scope"
having values {IMPLEMENTATION, TEST} to be able to annotate tests this
way, too.
Bernd
