[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12712601#action_12712601
]
Sai Pullabhotla commented on FTPSERVER-304:
-------------------------------------------
Well...The impression I get by looking at the configuration options/reading the
documentation is that the "idle-timeout" parameter is *NOT* the max-idle-time,
but is the *default* timeout.
Below is the snippet from the documentation:
idle-timeout - The number of seconds before an inactive client is disconnected
Basically we should be able to support the following:
* There should be a way on "User" records which tells us that the user gets the
default timeout which is defined on the listener. Since the timeout on User
records is an integer, it has to be a value that is less than 0. 0 would mean
infinite and a positive number implies a finite timeout.
* Ability to override the timeout on a per user basis. This could be less than
the default timeout, greater than the default timeout or infinite timeout. For
example, all "admin" level users might want to have infinite timeout even
though the default timeout is set to 300.
I'm not sure if it is of much advantage to support 'max-idle-timeout' (if we do
the above two), but if you think it is, then we should perhaps add another
configuration option for max-idle-timeout keeping the existing one as default
timeout.
Hope this makes sense. Let me know what you think.
> The Idle Timeout set in the listener configuration does not have any effect
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FTPSERVER-304
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FTPSERVER-304
> Project: FtpServer
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 1.0.1
> Reporter: Sai Pullabhotla
> Fix For: 1.0.2
>
>
> As reported on the mailing list by Johannes, I confirmed that the idle
> timeout set on the listener factory did not have any effect. The
> connection/session is still good long after the specified idle timeout. As
> far as I can remember this used to work fine in pre-1.0 releases. We also
> have to make sure that the idle timeout on the data connections works.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
