On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Johannes Katelaan <[email protected]> wrote: > So if you fix what you have identified as the bug, I think everybody would > be happy, because setting the *maximum* idle timeout on listener level would > then force the infinite user level timeout to this maximum value. So in fact > it would work like a default for the user level timeout, which is exactly > what we want.
Yes, that the general idea. Note however that this does not support the requirement outlined by Sai where different users would have different idle times (admins having longer idle times) since all would be forced by the listener limit. /niklas
