On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 20:04, Niklas Gustavsson<[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Bernd Fondermann<[email protected]> > wrote: >> Wait a second... it's the other way round!! ;-) > > :-D > >> This change breaks the setter injection with spring (and that's the >> reason why it was named 'set', not 'add'... > > I find the best way around this is usually to have a Spring helper class.
+1, at the time I introduced the method this seemed overhead, but now it seems the better solution. Bernd
