On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:52, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/29/10 9:40 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: >> >> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:36, Julien Vermillard<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Le Mon, 29 Mar 2010 07:27:02 +0200, >>> Emmanuel Lecharny<[email protected]> a écrit : >>> >>> >>>> >>>> On 3/29/10 6:57 AM, Bernd Fondermann wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi everone, >>>>> >>>>> Just wanted to start collecting thoughts from everyone what we need >>>>> to do before moving Vysper out of sandbox? >>>>> >>>>> I think a proper website would be needed, anything else? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Already done ! http://mina.apache.org/vysper/ >>>> >>>> Documentation ... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> IMO some class miss javadoc, there is room for improvement. >>> Randomly pciked examples : >>> >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/sandbox/vysper/trunk/server/core/src/main/java/org/apache/vysper/xmpp/authorization/AccountCreationException.java >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/sandbox/vysper/trunk/server/core/src/main/java/org/apache/vysper/xmpp/delivery/LocalDeliveryUtils.java >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/sandbox/vysper/trunk/server/core/src/main/java/org/apache/vysper/xmpp/delivery/StanzaRelayBroker.java >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/sandbox/vysper/trunk/server/core/src/main/java/org/apache/vysper/xmpp/delivery/failure/ServiceNotAvailableException.java >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/sandbox/vysper/trunk/server/core/src/main/java/org/apache/vysper/xmpp/delivery/StanzaReceiverRelay.java >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/sandbox/vysper/trunk/server/core/src/main/java/org/apache/vysper/xmpp/modules/roster/RosterGroup.java >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/sandbox/vysper/trunk/server/core/src/main/java/org/apache/vysper/xmpp/modules/roster/RosterStanzaUtils.java >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/sandbox/vysper/trunk/server/core/src/main/java/org/apache/vysper/xmpp/modules/extension/xep0092_software_version/SoftwareVersionModule.java >>> >> >> patches, as always, are welcome! :-) >> > > This is not exactly the kind of response we should expect here...
Who is "we"? I don't want to step on anyones toes but cannot help that I sometimes do not feel obliged to bind myself to other's expectations. > Sorry Bernd, but we suffered - and are still suffering - from the same exact > problem in MINA care : lack of javadoc. You don't have to apologize, no problem. > I don't know who is in better position to inject Javadoc than the one who > write the code. The person actually having the time to review code and add anything that's missing, functionality, javadoc etc. > So I totally +1 Julien's position. We need more Javadoc, +1. I totally agree. > we don't need > 'patches welcome' mails. Who is "we" in this case? and What's the exact problem with those mails? It's the everlasting truth in open source :-) Bernd
