On 9/21/10 5:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Sep 20, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:

On 9/20/10 9:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
On Sep 20, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
All I did was

mvn rat:check -fn
To get the full report, one should do mvn site and get the report from 
target/site/rat-report.html, which I did.

Summary
-------
Notes: 0
Binaries: 4
Archives: 0
Standards: 639

Apache Licensed: 613
Generated Documents: 0

JavaDocs are generated and so license header is optional
Generated files do not required license headers

26 Unknown Licenses



There are some missing ASL header in the following files :

!????? mina-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mina/proxy/utils/MD4.java
!????? 
mina-core/src/test/java/org/apache/mina/core/service/AbstractIoServiceTest.java
!????? 
mina-core/src/test/java/org/apache/mina/filter/logging/LoadTestMdcInjectionFilter.java
!????? mina-legal/src/main/resources/notices.xml

Should we abort the release once more for those 4 files, two of them having 
been added whiel I was fighting with Maven, or can we wait for a 2.0.1 ?

Frankly, I would rather release a 2.0.1 immediately than going through the 
2.0.0 vote again.

wdyt ?
It's my understanding that those files are required to have an ASL header 
before a release can happen.
I can fix them, build a release, and launch the vote again, but with a shortest delay, maybe, assuming that this will be the only modifications...

--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com

Reply via email to