On Sep 21, 2010, at 1:44 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: > On 9/21/10 5:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >> On Sep 20, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >> >>> On 9/20/10 9:31 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: >>>> On Sep 20, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >>>> All I did was >>>> >>>> mvn rat:check -fn >>> To get the full report, one should do mvn site and get the report from >>> target/site/rat-report.html, which I did. >>> >>> Summary >>> ------- >>> Notes: 0 >>> Binaries: 4 >>> Archives: 0 >>> Standards: 639 >>> >>> Apache Licensed: 613 >>> Generated Documents: 0 >>> >>> JavaDocs are generated and so license header is optional >>> Generated files do not required license headers >>> >>> 26 Unknown Licenses >>> >>> >>> >>> There are some missing ASL header in the following files : >>> >>> !????? mina-core/src/main/java/org/apache/mina/proxy/utils/MD4.java >>> !????? >>> mina-core/src/test/java/org/apache/mina/core/service/AbstractIoServiceTest.java >>> !????? >>> mina-core/src/test/java/org/apache/mina/filter/logging/LoadTestMdcInjectionFilter.java >>> !????? mina-legal/src/main/resources/notices.xml >>> >>> Should we abort the release once more for those 4 files, two of them having >>> been added whiel I was fighting with Maven, or can we wait for a 2.0.1 ? >>> >>> Frankly, I would rather release a 2.0.1 immediately than going through the >>> 2.0.0 vote again. >>> >>> wdyt ? >> It's my understanding that those files are required to have an ASL header >> before a release can happen. > I can fix them, build a release, and launch the vote again, but with a > shortest delay, maybe, assuming that this will be the only modifications...
Sounds good. I don't have any other tests other than building and getting rat to pass. Regards, Alan
