Is that it? Just two votes? On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 2:13 PM Jonathan Valliere <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 2:10 PM Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Le jeu. 25 avr. 2019 à 18:27, Jonathan Valliere <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >> >> > I'd like to call a vote on the following proposal for branch changes for >> > MINA. >> > >> > 1. Rename 2.1 to 2.1.X because 2.1 is our root branch from which >> 2.1.1 >> > and 2.1.2 spawn. The HEAD of 2.1.X should represent the current >> > unreleased >> > version in the 2.1 track. >> >> >> +1 >> >> >> > 2. Rename 2.0 to 2.0.X because 2.0 is our root branch from which >> 2.0.16+ >> > spawn. The HEAD of 2.0.X should represent the current unreleased >> > version >> > in the 2.0 track. >> >> >> +1 >> >> >> > 3. Remove 2.1.0 because it tracks 2.1.X and prefer to use tags for >> > specific versions unless there is a specific reason why new >> maintenance >> > branches are >> >> >> Being far from my computer, I can’t check what this 2.1.0 is. From the top >> of my head, it’s a tag, but if it’s a branch, then it’s bad. We need to >> clarify that. > > > 2.1.0 is a branch currently. Update proposal to remove the 2.1.0 branch > after making sure 2.1 and 2.1.0 are at the same HEAD. > > >> >> Thanks for the proposals, they make a lot if sense. >> >> We probably should also decide something related to 3.X: I don’t think it >> will go any farther, and we may need this 3.X for the future evolutions. >> -- >> Regards, >> Cordialement, >> Emmanuel Lécharny >> www.iktek.com >> > -- > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email message and any > attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain > confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected > from disclosure. >
