Put a "[VOTE]" on the beginning of the subject line so it gets people’s attention better. This thread looks more like a discussion than a vote. But if it is a vote...
+1 Jeff > On May 1, 2019, at 6:06 AM, Jonathan Valliere <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is that it? Just two votes? > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 2:13 PM Jonathan Valliere <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 2:10 PM Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Le jeu. 25 avr. 2019 à 18:27, Jonathan Valliere <[email protected]> a >>> écrit : >>> >>>> I'd like to call a vote on the following proposal for branch changes for >>>> MINA. >>>> >>>> 1. Rename 2.1 to 2.1.X because 2.1 is our root branch from which >>> 2.1.1 >>>> and 2.1.2 spawn. The HEAD of 2.1.X should represent the current >>>> unreleased >>>> version in the 2.1 track. >>> >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>>> 2. Rename 2.0 to 2.0.X because 2.0 is our root branch from which >>> 2.0.16+ >>>> spawn. The HEAD of 2.0.X should represent the current unreleased >>>> version >>>> in the 2.0 track. >>> >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>>> 3. Remove 2.1.0 because it tracks 2.1.X and prefer to use tags for >>>> specific versions unless there is a specific reason why new >>> maintenance >>>> branches are >>> >>> >>> Being far from my computer, I can’t check what this 2.1.0 is. From the top >>> of my head, it’s a tag, but if it’s a branch, then it’s bad. We need to >>> clarify that. >> >> >> 2.1.0 is a branch currently. Update proposal to remove the 2.1.0 branch >> after making sure 2.1 and 2.1.0 are at the same HEAD. >> >> >>> >>> Thanks for the proposals, they make a lot if sense. >>> >>> We probably should also decide something related to 3.X: I don’t think it >>> will go any farther, and we may need this 3.X for the future evolutions. >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Cordialement, >>> Emmanuel Lécharny >>> www.iktek.com >>> >> -- >> >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email message and any >> attachments are intended solely for the addressee(s) and may contain >> confidential and/or privileged information and may be legally protected >> from disclosure. >>
