[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16840440#comment-16840440
 ] 

David M. Lloyd commented on DIRMINA-1108:
-----------------------------------------

Normally thread pool termination with `shutdown` should be immediate (all 
threads terminating) as long as there are no running or queued tasks; if that's 
not the case then I'd call it a bug, no matter what implementation it showed up 
in.  `shutdownNow` would only be for unusual situations as it's a sort of 
"force stop" which could have unwanted side-effects.

> ThreadPoolExecutors should terminate faster
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRMINA-1108
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-1108
>             Project: MINA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.1.2
>            Reporter: Guus der Kinderen
>            Priority: Minor
>
> I've observed that the termination of 
> {{org.apache.mina.filter.executor.PriorityThreadPoolExecutor}} takes another 
> 30 seconds after the last task was executed. More specifically, it takes 30 
> seconds "to long" before 
> {{org.apache.mina.filter.executor.PriorityThreadPoolExecutor#awaitTermination}}
>  returns {{true}}.
> It is likely that this issue also applies to 
> {{org.apache.mina.filter.executor.OrderedThreadPoolExecutor}}, and maybe 
> {{org.apache.mina.filter.executor.UnorderedThreadPoolExecutor}}, as a lot of 
> code is shared between these implementations. I did not explicitly verify 
> these implementations though.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to