On 4/3/16, 11:07 PM, "saint....@gmail.com on behalf of Stack"
<saint....@gmail.com on behalf of st...@duboce.net> wrote:

>On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Wang, Yanping <yanping.w...@intel.com>
>wrote:
>
>> Hi, All
>>
>> Uma, Gary, and I put up following draft. Does it look ok?
>>
>> =====================================
>> -------------------- Summary of podling reports --------------------
>> * Still getting started at the Incubator
>> Mnemonic
>>
>>
>Reports normally start with the below. They don't include the '>>'.
>Checkout past wiki postings for examples.
>
>
>> --------------------
>> Mnemonic
>> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place
>> structured data processing and computing.
>>
>> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03.
>> Due to the delay of SGA, Mnemonic code was moved in ASF on 3/24.
>>
>>
>s/in/into/
>
>FYI, delays are normal.
>
>
>
>> >>Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>> 1. Name search JIRA is filed:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-95, We propose
>> "Mnemonic" is a suitable name for this project.
>> 2.
>> 3.
>>
>>
>See other reports for examples of what to fill in for #2 and #3.
>
>But I'd suggest #1 is NOT one of the most important issues you need to
>work
>on to graduate (It belongs in the report but not at this point IMO)
I think we should add a point about community building. Plans/efforts
towards attracting more users and contributors. Eventually we nominate
them as committers after we received the welcomed contributions. I noticed
this point has become one of the major obstacle point for graduating some
other project from Incubation. This is very important point for project
health and future.
>
>
>
>> >>Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
>> aware of?
>> None
>>
>> >>How has the community developed since the last report?
>> No new development as the project was just moved in.
>> This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early
>> stage in setting up the infra, no new contributors joined yet other
>>than 10
>> listed in Mnemonic proposal.
>>
>> Any detail on what still has to be done to be fully moved over? Usually
>folks note meetups, talks, ML subscription counts (See wiki for other
>example reports on what folks do in here)
>
>
>
>> >>How has the project developed since the last report?
>> We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We
>> are doing several refactoring to fit Apache project standard.
>>
>
>s/refactoring/refactorings/
>
>
>> We are defining coding guidelines the roadmap for the project,
>
>
>Is the above complete?
>
>
>
>> working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying pooling
>> mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure. Apache
>>Arrow
>> community is very interested in this Mnemonic integration for extending
>> Arrow into persistent memory and storage.
>>
>> Bug tracking JIRA setup was done and 6 issues reported. Mailing list
>> discussions are happening actively related to infrastructure needs and
>> other directions for the project.
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577
>>
>> >>Date of last release:
>> No release yet
>>
>> >>When were the last committers or PMC members elected?
>> No election, since the project is just starting.
>> As part of Incubation, initial committers were proposed and added. After
>> that no new committers added yet.
>>
>> ====================================
>>
>> Thanks
>> Yanping
>>
>>
>Otherwise, looks great.
>
>St.Ack
>
>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:ph...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 9:51 AM
>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Mnemonic board report due in one week.
>>
>> Hi folks. The Mnemonic board report is due in one week, Weds April
>> 6th. You will be reporting monthly for the first quarter, then
>> quarterly after that. The final form of the report needs to be posted
>> here by April 6th:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016
>>
>> Most communities put together a draft report following the format laid
>> out on that link in their public dev list. Then post it to the wiki.
>> If you have any questions please ask and the mentors can provide
>> insight.
>>
>> Patrick
>>

Reply via email to