Hi Henry, right now, we can get notification once a PR has been pushed to the mirrored repos in Github, is it good enough for us ? as we known, we are not able to use Github interface to accept PR so if you agree we can close this ticket if desired, Thanks.
On 4/6/2016 11:09 AM, Wang, Yanping wrote: > It looks like https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577 is waiting > for Gary to verify the issue can be resolved without any change of current > Infra. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rakesh Radhakrishnan [mailto:rakeshr.apa...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2016 10:21 AM > To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week. > > I could see INFRA-11577 is not resolved and status is 'waiting for user'. > Should we include infrastructure open issues in report? > > > Rakesh > > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Wang, Yanping <yanping.w...@intel.com> > wrote: > >> Sure :-) >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Henry Saputra [mailto:henry.sapu...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 11:23 PM >> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week. >> >> This one looks good to me. >> >> Please remove "This is the first board report from Mnemonic" - I do not >> think it is necessary. >> >> - Henry >> >> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Wang, Yanping <yanping.w...@intel.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Thanks all for the feedback. >>> Below is report I filed tonight. We have 1 day to modify it as needed. >>> ============================================ >>> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place >>> structured data processing and computing. >>> >>> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03. >>> Mnemonic code was moved into ASF on 3/24 >>> >>> Various metrics for March are as follows: >>> +--------------------------------------------+ >>> | Metric | counts | >>> +--------------------------------------------+ >>> | Non Merge Commits | 82 | >>> | Contributors | 10 | >>> | Jira New Issues | 13 | >>> | Resolved Issues | 4 | >>> | Pull Requests merged | | >>> | Pull Requests proposed | 3 | >>> +--------------------------------------------+ >>> >>> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation: >>> >>> 1. Apache releases: we are preparing 0.1.0 release >>> 2. Expand and build strong community, keep active dev list discussions, >>> adding new contributors >>> 3. Develop new features >>> >>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be >>> aware of? >>> Everything is on track, nothing urgent at this time. >>> >>> >>> How has the community developed since the last report? >>> This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early >>> stage in setting up the infra. In addition to contributors listed in >>> Mnemonic proposal, we had one new contributor joined us. We are actively >>> discuss with Arrow community in dev list for the idea on integration. >>> Apache Arrow community is very interested in Mnemonic integration for >>> extending Arrow into persistent memory and storage. >>> >>> >>> How has the project developed since the last report? >>> We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We >>> are doing several refactorings and defining coding guidelines to fit >> Apache >>> project standard. >>> We are working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying >>> pooling mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure. >>> We are structuring native computing feature interface. >>> Bug tracking JIRA setup was done, 13 issues were filed. 4 issues were >>> solved. >>> Mailing list discussions are happening actively related to >> infrastructure, >>> code standard, features for the project. >>> >>> >>> Date of last release: >>> No release yet, working on 0.1.0 release >>> >>> When were the last committers or PMC members elected? >>> No election, since the project is just starting. >>> As part of incubation process, initial committers and contributors were >>> proposed and added. >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: saint....@gmail.com [mailto:saint....@gmail.com] On Behalf Of >> Stack >>> Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2016 11:08 PM >>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: Mnemonic board report due in one week. >>> >>> On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Wang, Yanping <yanping.w...@intel.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, All >>>> >>>> Uma, Gary, and I put up following draft. Does it look ok? >>>> >>>> ===================================== >>>> -------------------- Summary of podling reports -------------------- >>>> * Still getting started at the Incubator >>>> Mnemonic >>>> >>>> >>> Reports normally start with the below. They don't include the '>>'. >>> Checkout past wiki postings for examples. >>> >>> >>>> -------------------- >>>> Mnemonic >>>> Mnemonic is a Java based non-volatile memory library for in-place >>>> structured data processing and computing. >>>> >>>> Mnemonic has been incubating since 2016-03-03. >>>> Due to the delay of SGA, Mnemonic code was moved in ASF on 3/24. >>>> >>>> >>> s/in/into/ >>> >>> FYI, delays are normal. >>> >>> >>> >>>>>> Three most important issues to address in the move towards >> graduation: >>>> 1. Name search JIRA is filed: >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-95, We propose >>>> "Mnemonic" is a suitable name for this project. >>>> 2. >>>> 3. >>>> >>>> >>> See other reports for examples of what to fill in for #2 and #3. >>> >>> But I'd suggest #1 is NOT one of the most important issues you need to >> work >>> on to graduate (It belongs in the report but not at this point IMO) >>> >>> >>> >>>>>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be >>>> aware of? >>>> None >>>> >>>>>> How has the community developed since the last report? >>>> No new development as the project was just moved in. >>>> This is the first board report from Mnemonic. The project is in early >>>> stage in setting up the infra, no new contributors joined yet other >> than >>> 10 >>>> listed in Mnemonic proposal. >>>> >>>> Any detail on what still has to be done to be fully moved over? Usually >>> folks note meetups, talks, ML subscription counts (See wiki for other >>> example reports on what folks do in here) >>> >>> >>> >>>>>> How has the project developed since the last report? >>>> We ported source code in Apache on 3/24 after SGA was filed on 3/23. We >>>> are doing several refactoring to fit Apache project standard. >>>> >>> s/refactoring/refactorings/ >>> >>> >>>> We are defining coding guidelines the roadmap for the project, >>> >>> Is the above complete? >>> >>> >>> >>>> working on enabling Apache Arrow to use Mnemonic as underlying pooling >>>> mechanism, and designing the native computing infrastructure. Apache >>> Arrow >>>> community is very interested in this Mnemonic integration for extending >>>> Arrow into persistent memory and storage. >>>> >>>> Bug tracking JIRA setup was done and 6 issues reported. Mailing list >>>> discussions are happening actively related to infrastructure needs and >>>> other directions for the project. >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11577 >>>> >>>>>> Date of last release: >>>> No release yet >>>> >>>>>> When were the last committers or PMC members elected? >>>> No election, since the project is just starting. >>>> As part of Incubation, initial committers were proposed and added. >> After >>>> that no new committers added yet. >>>> >>>> ==================================== >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Yanping >>>> >>>> >>> Otherwise, looks great. >>> >>> St.Ack >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:ph...@apache.org] >>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 9:51 AM >>>> To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org >>>> Subject: Mnemonic board report due in one week. >>>> >>>> Hi folks. The Mnemonic board report is due in one week, Weds April >>>> 6th. You will be reporting monthly for the first quarter, then >>>> quarterly after that. The final form of the report needs to be posted >>>> here by April 6th: >>>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016 >>>> >>>> Most communities put together a draft report following the format laid >>>> out on that link in their public dev list. Then post it to the wiki. >>>> If you have any questions please ask and the mentors can provide >>>> insight. >>>> >>>> Patrick >>>>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
