I am ok with 1) if 2) is an issue. Thx debo
On 4/20/16, 1:59 PM, "Wang, Yanping" <yanping.w...@intel.com> wrote: >I vote for (1) , it might take a bit longer time initially, but it will be >better and easier to manage the site later. >I saw many projects have separate site.git. >https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf >Such as: Kudu, Gearpump, arrow, flink, hbase, kafka, beam, etc > >Thanks, >Yanping > >-----Original Message----- >From: Gary [mailto:ga...@apache.org] >Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 1:43 PM >To: dev@mnemonic.incubator.apache.org >Subject: Decision on whether or not to setup Mnemonic website as a independent >git repo. > >Hi, at this point, we face a decision on how to organize the Mnemonic >repo. I think there are two feasible options for us to choose. > > 1) setup a indenpendt git repo dedicated for Mnemonic website i.e. >incubator-mnemonic-site.git > > 2) using branch asf-site of incubator-mnemonic.git to dist. website >contents. > >Please choose, Thanks. > >B.R, >+Gary > >
