Hi Yanping, Thank you very much, I have removed that item as you suggested.
Regarding the Hbase, I think how about to consult their community to find out what we can help ? For the use cases, Yes, I understood your concerns, according to my observation, it seems no urgent to fully adopt the new concepts/models proposed by Mnemonic if the hardware platform is not yet ready as we expected. but we believe that it will come soon, for now, my 2 cents, we could put our limited resources on improving the quality and adding essential features to Mnemonic. As we known, to address the performance issues is tend to be obscure and complicated, the Mnemonic might help to foster new architecture to overcome some of performance bottlenecks for data processing and engineering, so probably It looks not much straightforward to understand or use, but we are trying to improve the documentation and examples as well as hoping more developers could help our community to grow. Thanks. Very truly yours, +Gary On 12/5/2016 9:00 PM, Yanping Wang wrote: > Hi, Gary > > For the items listed, the project needs to have a execution plan. > I suggest you remove "Introduced women developers to our incubating > project." all developers are equal, there is no difference between women > and men developers. > > I think the most important action item for this project is integration, ie. > find use cases, prove this project is useful.How's integration with HBase > going? > > You already developed this project with many features, but there is no > substantial use cases to show how to use this project. Many people even in > this dev list do not understand this project, and don't know how to use > this project. How to improve that? maybe an successful use case integration > would help. > > Thanks > yanping > > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Gary <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Patrick >> >> Thank you very much for your guiding and advice, I have corrected that as >> follows. >> >> 2. Introduced women developers to our incubating project. >> 3. Improved dev. docker to facilitate development. >> 4. provided information to potential customers e.g. bank user, other >> Apache project's committers >> >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2016 >> >> Please review it again, Thanks ! >> >> Very truly yours, >> +Gary >> >> >> On 12/5/2016 12:46 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: >>> I signed off on the report. One thing I noticed is that you list your >> "top >>> 3 for graduation", however that's not really what's gating your >> graduation. >>> Please review >>> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy. >> html#Graduating+from+the+Incubator >>> Item 1 in your report is on point (experience delivering releases, >> ensuring >>> apache release guidelines/requirements are followed) however the other >> two >>> are not gaiting your graduation. I would say instead that building >>> community (including committers/pmc) and increasing diversity, so that >> you >>> can stand alone as a TLP, is missing. >>> >>> Patrick >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Gary <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi PMCs and Developers >>>> >>>> We have submitted the quarterly board report as follows, Please review, >>>> feedback and approve this report, Thanks! >>>> >>>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2016 >>>> >>>> Very truly yours, >>>> +Gary >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
