Those are great goals, however the only things really gating graduation at
this point IMO (other mentors can chime in if they feel otw) is; 1)
continue driving releases, esp with different release managers to show that
a number of people understand "the Apache way" (one aspect granted), 2)
increase community involvement, esp diversity (typically we talk about this
in terms of not having a single company represented, but overall diversity
is a good goal as well) in committer/pmc membership.

Regards,

Patrick


On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Gary <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Patrick
>
> Thank you very much for your guiding and advice, I have corrected that as
> follows.
>
>   2. Introduced women developers to our incubating project.
>   3. Improved dev. docker to facilitate development.
>   4. provided information to potential customers e.g. bank user, other
> Apache project's committers
>
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2016
>
> Please review it again, Thanks !
>
> Very truly yours,
> +Gary
>
>
> On 12/5/2016 12:46 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> > I signed off on the report. One thing I noticed is that you list your
> "top
> > 3 for graduation", however that's not really what's gating your
> graduation.
> > Please review
> > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.htm
> l#Graduating+from+the+Incubator
> >
> > Item 1 in your report is on point (experience delivering releases,
> ensuring
> > apache release guidelines/requirements are followed) however the other
> two
> > are not gaiting your graduation. I would say instead that building
> > community (including committers/pmc) and increasing diversity, so that
> you
> > can stand alone as a TLP, is missing.
> >
> > Patrick
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Gary <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi PMCs and Developers
> >>
> >> We have submitted the quarterly board report as follows, Please review,
> >> feedback and approve this report, Thanks!
> >>
> >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2016
> >>
> >> Very truly yours,
> >> +Gary
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>

Reply via email to