[
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_93536
]
Barrie Treloar commented on MOJO-739:
-------------------------------------
My lack of understanding Maven internals.
>From what I can tell, you map the packaging element to an artifact type.
Which is probably the cause of the problem in the first comment about being
"pde" instead of "zip".
plugin = jar
feature = jar
product = zip
and I dont think you can do this multi mapping with one lifecycle.
Also the product lifecycle does not to generate a build xml file, so this is
taken out if its lifecycle.
It is more duplication, but it only affects the us, the end users dont see any
of this, they choose the packaging type to match the pde project they are
working and everything is bound correctly. It ends up being less work for them.
> Create a new lifecycle instead of binding ontop of zip.
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MOJO-739
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-739
> Project: Mojo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: pde
> Reporter: Barrie Treloar
>
> The pde plugin should probably bind to a new lifecylcle instead of re-using
> the zip one.
> Something like "pde".
> With MOJO-738 changing the artifact type to "jar" instead of "zip" for plugin
> builds, it makes sense to move away from the zip lifecycle.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
