Hi,

I don’t think that this plugin will became one of the most popular maven
plugin.

The reason of this project creation is to be able to use versions, roadmaps
and release notes. I saw other project plugins with few issues, so I thank
that the plugin commiter has the choice.

If there isn’t any objection, I prefer to have one.

 

I will propose a new vote according to the comment, votations, etc. that
have been raised with this thread.

 

Thanks for your help,

 

Philippe

 

  _____  

From: Dan Tran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: dimanche 6 mai 2007 08:16
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [vote] release maven-fitnesse-plugin 1.0

 

I dont think there is  rule about having one JIRA project per mojo's plugin.

but concensius is how popular/big the project is.

 


-D
 

On 5/5/07, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

I think, I already created the component in the MOJO project in Jira.
Some MOJO projects have their own Jira but it's not always the case. 
Maven 2.x Castor Plugin
<http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/project/ViewProject.jspa?pid=11191> 
Maven 2.x Clirr Plugin
<http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/project/ViewProject.jspa?pid=11227> 
Maven 2.x Cobertura Plugin
<http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/project/ViewProject.jspa?pid=11226> 
Maven 2.x Commons-attributes Plugin
<http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/project/ViewProject.jspa?pid=11213> 
....
I don't know what is the rule to have your own Jira project.
I someone can confirm to me that it is possible for this plugin, I can
create the project in Jira. 

Arnaud 

 

On 05/05/07, Dan Tran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

I have right to create a mojo component for Fitnesse, we normally do that
for most plugins at mojo

 

Second, if you think your mojo interface is very stable then you can call
beta, however it is a safe bet to 

go with alpha for a few round of feedback then release it as a beta

 

+1 for alpha

 

-D



 

On 5/5/07, Philippe Kernevez <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: 

Hi,

 

I don't have enough right for opening an issue on this project.

Does any body can help me about what should I do for the creation of my new
jira project "Maven 2.x Fitnesse Plugin" ? 

I don't find any existing thread about that on the mailing list. I should
miss something simple… 

 

Thanks

 

 

 

  _____  

From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: vendredi 4 mai 2007 23:41 


To: [email protected]  <mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [vote] release maven-fitnesse-plugin 1.0

 

I'm not sure that you need to launch a vote to promote it (we are not in the
apache community which is more strict). 
For jira, I think you have to open an in issue in MPA :
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPA
a kind administrator will do it for you 

Arnaud

On 04/05/07, Philippe Kernevez < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:

I understood that the graduation was subsequent to the first release. 

Do I need to call for a vote for the graduation, or do I make it directly ? 

How can I ask for the creation of the "maven-fitnesse-plugin" jira project
?



> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Raphaël Piéroni [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ]
> Sent: vendredi 4 mai 2007 12:23
> To: [email protected] 
> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] [vote] release maven-fitnesse-plugin 1.0
>
> -1 to release directly to 1.0 from sandbox
>
> +1 to graduate to proper
> +0 to release to 1.0-alpha-1
> 
> Raphaël 
>
> 2007/5/4, Arnaud HERITIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > +1
> >
> > Arnaud 
> >
> >
> > On 04/05/07, Philippe Kernevez < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'd like to release the maven-fitnesse-plugin 1.0, presently in the
> > mojo-sandbox.
> > > 
> > >
> > > The release notes are there:
> > http://mojo.codehaus.org/fitnesse-maven-plugin/changes-report.html
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The plugin is fully functional with fitnesse 20050731 and have some
> > limitation with fitnesse 20060719 (see: 
> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-778 ).
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Vote open for 72hours. 
> > >
> > > My +1
> > >
> > > Philippe
> > >
> > >
> > 
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > .......................................................... 
> > Arnaud Héritier
> > OCTO Technology
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ..........................................................
> > 50, Avenue des Champs-Elysées 
> > 75008 Paris
> > Tél : (33) 1 58 56 10 00
> > Fax : (33) 1 58 56 10 01 
> > GSM : (33) 6 03 52 71 31
> > www.octo.com <http://www.octo.com/>  | blog.octo.com
<http://blog.octo.com/> 
> > ...........................................................


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email




-- 

.......................................................... 
Arnaud Héritier
OCTO Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
..........................................................
50, Avenue des Champs-Elysées
75008 Paris
Tél : (33) 1 58 56 10 00 
Fax : (33) 1 58 56 10 01
GSM : (33) 6 03 52 71 31
www.octo.com <http://www.octo.com/>  | blog.octo.com <http://blog.octo.com/>

........................................................... 

 







-- 

.......................................................... 


Arnaud Héritier
OCTO Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
..........................................................
50, Avenue des Champs-Elysées
75008 Paris
Tél : (33) 1 58 56 10 00
Fax : (33) 1 58 56 10 01
GSM : (33) 6 03 52 71 31
www.octo.com <http://www.octo.com/>  | blog.octo.com <http://blog.octo.com/>

........................................................... 

 

Reply via email to