On Aug 10, 2007, at 1:47 AM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Jason Dillon wrote:
Doesn't look like you have deployed an updated site yet... nor
published 1.0-beta-1-SNAPSHOT artifacts for folks to play with and
test.
I'd personally like to see both of these before I would vote on it.
Also, `mvn docck:check` is complaining about some stuff, which
should also be fixed up.
* * *
Oh, and you haven't re-written this using the Groovy integration
yet... so forget about it :-P I'm just kidding... sorta ;-) hehe
What would be benefit of that be? What would it bring?
You know I was being sarcastic right?
But, I would like to see more plugins being developed using the
Groovy Mojo support :-) One big advantage IMO is that usually,
Groovy implementations require less code to perform the same tasks.
So, less code, same functionality... means less bits to maintain.
For example take a look at the maven-install-pluigin:install source:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/trunk/maven-
install-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/install/
InstallMojo.java
And compare that to the install-maven-plugin example I created:
https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/groovy/examples/install-
maven-plugin/src/main/groovy/org/codehaus/mojo/groovy/examples/
install/InstallMojo.groovy
They both do the same thing.
* * *
Anyways, I was just being silly... but at the same time trying to
promote using Groovy ;-)
Cheers,
--jason
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
