It will be option A in order to keep compatibility. I am travelling this week so I will fix it on the weekend and post a snapshot when I am back.
I am in the midst of refactoring the plug-in and do have plans to also use other reporters. I will need to submit some of my patches to FindBugs first before this can be done with the plug-in -- Regards, Garvin LeClaire [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 8/12/07, Stephen Connolly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Just to let you know (as the submitter of the JIRA) > > We'd prefer if patch-b (which allows generating xml report) or similar was > used rather than changing the xdoc format. > > It is a pain maintaining two sets of parsers, and the xml report contains > all the information we require anyway. > > If the stream handling in patch-b is not as tidy as you'd like, I can > refactor the stream-open/close code to within Reporter and produce a > patch-c. > > -Stephen Connolly > > (obviously i'm +1 but I know I have no standing (yet) in this community > ;-) > ) > > dvicente wrote: > > > > +1 for me > > > > "add extra informations" is not a problem. > > > > 2007/8/10, Garvin LeClaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > >> There has been a request to add extra information to the Findbugs in > the > >> JIRA <http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-882> > >> Please take a look and forward any questions. > >> > >> I want to make sure we do not break any other plug-ins with > dependencies > >> on the current layout. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> > >> > >> Garvin LeClaire > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE---Findbugs-xdoc-enhancement-tf4249607.html#a12112060 > Sent from the mojo - dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > >
