Brett Porter skrev:

On 13/05/2008, at 8:21 PM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:

What about compatability then?

Can we not keep the old ones and deprecate them? That's what I did with the old goals.

I would definitely like to remove all the unused code and to unify everything under a single API. The current code base has never been cleaned up after the initial code that was written.

However, I feel bad raising these issues without being able to actually get the time to fix them. So I won't veto it or anything, I just wish someone would take the time to get it done the way I want (which I know is not going to happen without spending more time on it).

On 14/05/2008, at 12:28 AM, Asgeir S. Nilsen wrote:
So when did you decide on changing the groupId to
org.codehaus.mojo.appassembler?

Apologies, I thought I posted explicitly about that to this list, but I can't find it. I changed it in January and posted about the other changes.

Given it has multiple modules, I think it makes sense - any objections?

What about leaving the maven plugin under the org.codehaus.mojo group id to not confuse people and let the rest of the code live under o.c.m.appassembler?

--
Trygve

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to