On 15/05/2008, at 10:29 PM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
Brett Porter skrev:
On 13/05/2008, at 8:21 PM, Trygve Laugstøl wrote:
What about compatability then?
Can we not keep the old ones and deprecate them? That's what I did
with the old goals.
I would definitely like to remove all the unused code and to unify
everything under a single API. The current code base has never been
cleaned up after the initial code that was written.
However, I feel bad raising these issues without being able to
actually get the time to fix them. So I won't veto it or anything, I
just wish someone would take the time to get it done the way I want
(which I know is not going to happen without spending more time on
it).
I understand, but I also don't have time to do that - and it doesn't
really impact the usability of it.
So I'll push forward with a release then?
On 14/05/2008, at 12:28 AM, Asgeir S. Nilsen wrote:
So when did you decide on changing the groupId to
org.codehaus.mojo.appassembler?
Apologies, I thought I posted explicitly about that to this list,
but I can't find it. I changed it in January and posted about the
other changes.
Given it has multiple modules, I think it makes sense - any
objections?
What about leaving the maven plugin under the org.codehaus.mojo
group id to not confuse people and let the rest of the code live
under o.c.m.appassembler?
Will do.
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
