is this valid ? the url is invalid <archive> http://archive.hausfoundation.org/lists/org.codehaus.mojo.scm/ </archive>
Do we have projects using this new pom yet. If not, we may want to wait. -D On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Our lastest Mojo parent dates back to April and I believe enough good things > have summed up to justify a new release. Apart from various plugin updates > this will be the first release using the new artifact id mojo-parent. The > mailing list infos have been updated, PMD/Checkstyle configurations are > tuned (e.g. exclude generated stuff from checks), breadcrumbs have been > added to the site descriptor. Last but not least, I just moved most of the > reports into a dedicated "reporting" profile. The intention is to speed up > editing/reviewing of APT/XDoc/FML documents by selectively disabling the > expensive reports via > > mvn site -D skipReports > > This will only generate a few of the standard reports and the plugin > documentation (useful to check mojo parameter docs). For the plugin I tested > with, this accelerated the site generation by a factor of 8 and brought it > below 20 seconds. > > Unlike things over at Apache, I opted to have the full report set run by > default just like good people run tests by default and disable them on > demand. > > A snapshot has been deployed [0], please give it a try on your favorite > plugin and vote > > [ ] +1 > [ ] 0 > [ ] -1 > > The vote is open for 72 hours and will succeed by lazy consensus. > > > Benjamin > > > [0] > http://snapshots.repository.codehaus.org/org/codehaus/mojo/mojo-parent/18-SNAPSHOT/mojo-parent-18-20080827.185648-4.pom > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
