2009/1/8 Benjamin Bentmann <[email protected]> > Stephen Connolly wrote: > > Another issue for me is how we handle the integration tests and >> integration >> test reporting. >> > > Not sure what exactly you mean with "reporting" here. It wasn't intended to > produce sites.
Reporting *in hudson* Hudson will give the unit test metrics.... AFAIK, Hudson does not understand about the integration test metrics.... so all we know is that something failed, no tracking of 30 vs 1 integration tests failing. > > AFAIK, the Maven Invoker Plugin, which is what a lot of the mojo plugins >> use >> > > We have also the Shitty Maven Plugin in use but it shouldn't matter what > plugin devs choose to orchestrate their ITs. As long as the ITs can be run > during the ordinary Maven build we're in good position. If the IT's are run a JUnit tests we get the graphs. > > > for ITs will either fail the build or not fail the build, and we currently >> do not have (AFAIK) a means of reporting the results of the Invoker >> plugin.... hmmm sounds like I'll need to write one! >> > > Sure, there's always place for improvements. > > While we are at this reporting topic, another question is if and how to > notify devs via emails. We could have Hudson send those notifications to > dev@ or maybe some despot is willing to create a new mailing list. The > latter option would be my personal favorite because I would rather avoid to > have d...@mojo end up like d...@commons. > > > Benjamin > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > >
