I would suggest to add it via a profile activation at release:perform,
once it is proved to work flawlessly  with ease. I am sure people will
not mind use it

-D

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Paul Gier<[email protected]> wrote:
> Within Red Hat it's a requirement that anything shipped with our products,
> including thirdparty jars, is rebuilt from source.  So that's part of my
> reasoning behind wanting this.  I realize that is not a requirement at most
> organizations, but it still seems better to have it available.
>
> The ideal solution IMO would be if the same jar/zip could be used for IDE
> integration and would contain the full sources for rebuilding, but I don't
> think that's possible.
>
> We don't have to require that the full source zips are uploaded.  Just
> making it recommended and easy to do is enough IMO.
>
> Brent Atkinson wrote:
>>
>> For what it's worth, I agree with Dan.
>>  I see the argument with change affecting SCM systems, but when you change
>> systems you're making a specific choice to break something where history
>> matters. If you're porting history, the identifier may change, but you
>> should still have the released code. If you're managing things
>> appropriately, you also have the binary dependencies.  Bundling what amounts
>> to a source rpm (zip in this case) for each release feels like a lazy,
>> brute-force source management method. I suppose if you have the resources to
>> throw at it, it can save you some headaches. Requiring it seems a bit
>> strong, especially if the safety net serves as a rationalization for quickly
>> migrating to the SCM du jour. That decision should still carry a
>> considerable burden with it.
>>  Maybe I'm missing the point?
>>  Brent
>>
>>>>> Dan Tran <[email protected]> 6/9/2009 6:43 PM >>>
>>
>> Is this really necessary? For me as long as I have the source [1],
>> that is all i want.
>>
>>
>>
>> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/mojo/build-helper-maven-plugin/1.3/
>>
>> -D
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>   http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to