I dont know when was the last time i have a problem with releasing a plugin at mojo :-) It is 'flawless' :-)
-Dan On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Paul Gier<[email protected]> wrote: > I don't know if I've ever seen Maven work "flawlessly with ease". ;) > > Dan Tran wrote: >> >> I would suggest to add it via a profile activation at release:perform, >> once it is proved to work flawlessly with ease. I am sure people will >> not mind use it >> >> -D >> >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Paul Gier<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Within Red Hat it's a requirement that anything shipped with our >>> products, >>> including thirdparty jars, is rebuilt from source. So that's part of my >>> reasoning behind wanting this. I realize that is not a requirement at >>> most >>> organizations, but it still seems better to have it available. >>> >>> The ideal solution IMO would be if the same jar/zip could be used for IDE >>> integration and would contain the full sources for rebuilding, but I >>> don't >>> think that's possible. >>> >>> We don't have to require that the full source zips are uploaded. Just >>> making it recommended and easy to do is enough IMO. >>> >>> Brent Atkinson wrote: >>>> >>>> For what it's worth, I agree with Dan. >>>> I see the argument with change affecting SCM systems, but when you >>>> change >>>> systems you're making a specific choice to break something where history >>>> matters. If you're porting history, the identifier may change, but you >>>> should still have the released code. If you're managing things >>>> appropriately, you also have the binary dependencies. Bundling what >>>> amounts >>>> to a source rpm (zip in this case) for each release feels like a lazy, >>>> brute-force source management method. I suppose if you have the >>>> resources to >>>> throw at it, it can save you some headaches. Requiring it seems a bit >>>> strong, especially if the safety net serves as a rationalization for >>>> quickly >>>> migrating to the SCM du jour. That decision should still carry a >>>> considerable burden with it. >>>> Maybe I'm missing the point? >>>> Brent >>>> >>>>>>> Dan Tran <[email protected]> 6/9/2009 6:43 PM >>> >>>> >>>> Is this really necessary? For me as long as I have the source [1], >>>> that is all i want. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/codehaus/mojo/build-helper-maven-plugin/1.3/ >>>> >>>> -D >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >>> >>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >>> >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
