given my understanding of how GIT works, I think for the large number
of small projects at mojo, it might not be a good fit (since afaik GIT
works best when each repo is limited to a single project)
the bigger issue is mvn site-deploy
if we can find a quicker way than the current WebDAV as that is the
biggest pain point for me at mojo
Sent from my [rhymes with tryPod] ;-)
On 23 Nov 2009, at 12:45, Jason Dillon <[email protected]> wrote:
I'm a big fan of git, though git svn does the trick for me.
--jason
On Nov 23, 2009, at 9:41 AM, David J. M. Karlsen wrote:
I just noticed:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/CODEHAUS/Git+-+Migration
Anyone in favour of a migration for mojo?
I'm unsure of the difference in migration - "migration, a side-by-
side migration, or an empty Git repository".
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
