For example, to address this un-addressed issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MOJO-1199
http://github.com/astubbs/buildnumber-maven-plugin/commit/a7f99ffb58c2fc087614536bd5792b176fb5ad47 Antony Stubbs wrote: > > One of the big benefits is easy forking/patching and/with github. > > I'm dead keen to at least get a git mirror. > > > Lee Thompson wrote: >> >> I'm a big Git fan and GitHub as well. Though SVN is fine for me. >> >> >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Markus Knittig <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Mon, November 23, 2009 5:37:52 PM >> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] Move to GIT? >> >> On 11/23/2009 11:57 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote: >>> given my understanding of how GIT works, I think for the large number >>> of small projects at mojo, it might not be a good fit (since afaik GIT >>> works best when each repo is limited to a single project) >> >> Why not put every mojo project in a single repository and use submodules >> to bundle them all? >> Although SVN is fine as a contributor I would prefer GIT. >> >> Best regards, >> Markus >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >> > > ----- ___________________________ http://stubbisms.wordpress.com http://stubbisms.wordpress.com -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Move-to-GIT--tp26472059p28219208.html Sent from the mojo - dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
