May I ask why?

It seemed like a very natural fit to me. A tool like clirr seemed as it were
built to help enforce version standards.
Why not have it be explicit?

Rex

On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Evgeny Mandrikov <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hi Rex,
>
> First of all - thanks for your contribution. But I'm not sure about
> MCLIRR-33 - I think that clirr plugin should not be used for such
> tasks.
>
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Rex Hoffman <[email protected]> wrote:
> > First up, Thanks all for great maven plugins!!!
> > So just lobbed 3 jiras against the clirr mojo, all with patches of
> course.
> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCLIRR-31
> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCLIRR-32
> > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCLIRR-33
> > Site documentation fully updated.
> > 33's patch unfortunately contains the contents of 32's as well.
> > Did my best to minimize any potential side-effects.  Gave the code it's
> > first test (not a very impressive one).
> > I'd also like to write a plugin that takes the version number convergence
> > checks that are done in by the dependency analysis report and enforce
> them
> > at build time.
> > If you'd be willing to host it here, I'd be appreciative.
> > Rex Hoffman
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Evgeny Mandrikov aka Godin <http://godin.net.ru>
> http://twitter.com/_godin_
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
>

Reply via email to