On 17 September 2010 17:54, Robert Scholte <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is weird: mojo-parent[1] uses maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.5 in the
> build-section, but 2.2 in the reporting-section.
> These should be the same and would explain the problem.
>
> [1] http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/mojo-parent/pom.xml
Fixed in r12585.
> I think you should mentioned this. If there's any doubt, just sum these
> facts to confirm the apt-maven-plugin is still useful
Sure, I'll update the FAQ.
> Right now Mojo-developers have to modify their project if they want to do a
> site-deploy. The mojo-parent doesn't work out-of-the-box anymore where it
> should.
> So I'd suggest to fix this with the exclusion. I'll have another look at it
> and start a vote next week, so developers can use the parent as they used
> to, apart from the staging of course.
Okay, I'll pull-up the workaround into mojo-parent.
> Nope, I didn't say -1, since it's still a prerelease version. Also be aware
> that you didn't mention how the vote will pass. I *assume* lazy consensus,
> since that's what often happens, but I don't think that's the default-value
> ;)
I was too lazy to mention a lazy consensus :) Yep, I'm assuming a
lazy consensus.
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
