Brett will have to write for himself. From my point of view, either a proper Codehaus / Apache notice (one that claims copyright for Codehaus and then grants the license) or a BSD license would be fine. However, Brett likely knows something that I don't.
In both cases, my view is, following Larry Rosen, nothing in the GPL actually inhibits something like c-m-p from calling something like cobertura. On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@codehaus.org> wrote: > >> @Brett So if we change the license to BSD, we can use every class as we'd >> like to do? So no more reflection required? And does this require a vote? > > I'd be interested to learn why using a GPL'ed class in an BSD licensed > class doesn't enforce the latter to be GPL'ed when that should be the > case for an ASL'ed class? > > > > -- > I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye) > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
