I asked Cobertura-dev. Crickets. I think that Brett's position is that we're good to go, but it can't hurt to check in with the management.
Brett? On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Robert Scholte <[email protected]> wrote: > It has been almost a week since the last response. > To me it looks like there's no solution. I've added codehaus-support so Ben > and/or Bob have a chance to say some wise words. > Another suggestion could be to ask the cobertura-team what they think is > allowed for the plugin when using the cobertura-dependency. > I still believe it's also for them the best if this is solved, otherwise > they might loose it from tools like jacoco. > > -Robert > >> Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 14:39:21 +0200 >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> CC: [email protected]; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] Cobertura: in codehaus or out >> >> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> - ALv2 is not compatible with GPLv2 due to the patent terms, making >> >> that situation a bit weird. BSD would make that simpler, but I'm not sure >> >> it >> >> actually matters. >> >> AFAIK, that "not compatible" means, that ALv2 code cannot be used by >> or in GPLv2 code. It's not the other way round. >> >> >> >> Jochen >> >> >> -- >> I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye) >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
