Jochen,
I've worked with Larry some. I'm reasonably sure that he's fully tuned
in. His point is that while these people may think that they've
created a selective license, that such a thing has no legal substance
(since it's all one jar) and so they have, effectively, dual-licensed
it.
--benson
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Jochen Wiedmann
<jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> As far as I'm concerned, we can take the software under the most
>> liberal license available (AL 1.1) and ignore the GPL license entirely
>> for our purposes.
>
> If Larry's view is that using GPL'ed code in general is something then
> I am inclined to believe him. However, these words don't sound to me
> like he did really grab the situation: Cobertura is *not* dual
> licensed. Some parts of it are ASL 1.1, but others are GPL'ed.
>
>
> --
> I Am What I Am And That's All What I Yam (Popeye)
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
