IIRC there have been some issues with the licensing of this project. Suddenly
it changed from MIT to some company copyright, but it looks like this has been
reverted and slightly adjusted by mentioning some donation information. I think
this is okay right now. The project structure looks a bit strange to me. I
would have expected:chronos-maven-plugin \- src \- main \- test \-
it (here the integration tests)If there's no particular reason for this,
consider restructuring it, so it would look more like most other mojo plugins.
I haven't looked at the code yet, but Kents comment sounds interesting. If
JMeter is the only implementation, why not call it like that.That would also
make it easier to find for wandering users looking for some JMeter
Maven-plugin. -Robert
> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:10:00 -0400
> From: jie...@gmail.com
> To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org
> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] Vote: Promote chronos from sandbox to proper
>
> Greetings,
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Kent Sølvsten <k...@lakeside.dk> wrote:
> > I believe now is the time to promote the plugin from the sandbox. Since the
> > code should be in a pretty stable state, I expect to head immediately for a
> > beta release, and then hopefully a final 1.0 release within a month or 2.
>
> I don't have a binding vote. I find the naming of this plugin to be
> kind of misleading though, since all of the goals seem to deal with
> JMeter. Wouldn't this plugin fair better if named jmeter-maven-plugin?
> Or something else which otherwise informs the uninformed, at a glance,
> what this plugin is likely about..
>
> -Jesse
>
> --
> There are 10 types of people in this world, those
> that can read binary and those that can not.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
