> Why not extract the JMeter part and make a separate mojo-project of it?
> This might make a lot of people happy. The naming is less odd and there's an
> extra (JMeter) plugin with its own release cycle.
> I wouldn't include some functionality of which you expect to be replaced in
> the (near) future.
>

I'm +1 of this. Especially as it is clearly something of the chronos plugin
that you would deprecate later on. Deprecated stuff tends to stick for quite
some time...

/Anders


>
> -Robert
>
> ------------------------------
> From: k...@lakeside.dk
> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:32:46 +0200
>
> To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org
> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] Vote: Promote chronos from sandbox to proper
>
> I see what You mean with the structuring. I am not sure that Your suggested
> structure is a no-brainer, since the integrationtests are a suite of small
> independent maven projects, and NOT normal java based tests.
> But if other project do it this way, it should of course be aligned.
>
> The naming may be odd at first. The focus of the plugin have never been
> performing the tests, but rather analyzing the output from the tests,
> tracking historic developments, checking that goals have been met...
>
>  I believe in the concept of "do one thing and do it well". And the name
> jmeter-maven-plugin should IMHO be reserved for a plugin focused on invoking
> jmeter. When this project was started, there was no mature jmeter plugins at
> all, so "by coincidense"  support for that was added as well.
>
> Actually the name jmeter-maven-plugin is already taken by  a project hosted
> at googlecode (later moved to github), which is focused on the execution of
> JMeter. It does not seem very mature to me yet, but it actually is possible
> to use the jmeter-maven-plugin to invoke the performancetests, and then use
> chronos to analyze the results.
>
> As soon as i find a jmeter plugin which is mature enough, the intention is
> to deprecate the stuf about jmeter invocation inside chronos and recommend
> usage of other plugins to that task.
>
> Any comments on that?
>
> - Kent
>
>
>
> Den 27/06/2011 kl. 22.41 skrev Robert Scholte:
>
> IIRC there have been some issues with the licensing of this
> project. Suddenly it changed from MIT to some company copyright, but it
> looks like this has been reverted and slightly adjusted by mentioning some
> donation information. I think this is okay right now.
>
> The project structure looks a bit strange to me. I would have expected:
> chronos-maven-plugin
>  \- src
>      \- main
>      \- test
>      \- it (here the integration tests)
> If there's no particular reason for this, consider restructuring it, so it
> would look more like most other mojo plugins.
>
> I haven't looked at the code yet, but Kents comment sounds interesting. If
> JMeter is the only implementation, why not call it like that.
> That would also make it easier to find for wandering users looking for some
> JMeter Maven-plugin.
>
> -Robert
>
> > Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:10:00 -0400
> > From: jie...@gmail.com
> > To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org
> > Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] Vote: Promote chronos from sandbox to proper
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:08 AM, Kent Sølvsten <k...@lakeside.dk> wrote:
> > > I believe now is the time to promote the plugin from the sandbox. Since
> the code should be in a pretty stable state, I expect to head immediately
> for a beta release, and then hopefully a final 1.0 release within a month or
> 2.
> >
> > I don't have a binding vote. I find the naming of this plugin to be
> > kind of misleading though, since all of the goals seem to deal with
> > JMeter. Wouldn't this plugin fair better if named jmeter-maven-plugin?
> > Or something else which otherwise informs the uninformed, at a glance,
> > what this plugin is likely about..
> >
> > -Jesse
> >
> > --
> > There are 10 types of people in this world, those
> > that can read binary and those that can not.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >
> > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >
> >
>
>
>

Reply via email to