One thing I was thinking of is the last published date of the sites
(upper right corner). I use that date to see how long it was since the
last version of a plugin was released. If we re-publish that date will
be new and break my use-case. However, I fully understand that I might
be using that info incorrectly but it might be a normal way of using
it? Do anyone else do this?

/Anders
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 11:50, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@codehaus.org> wrote:
> Multimodule support available.
> I think we want MSKINS-14 too. I'd prefer to search through the whole
> mojo-site by default, not just the plugin-site because that's rather small.
>
> -Robert
>
> [1] https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSKINS-14
> ________________________________
> From: rfscho...@codehaus.org
> To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org
> Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 21:29:14 +0000
>
> Subject: RE: [mojo-dev] Using the new maven-fluido-skin for mojos
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/HAUS-2169 seems to be the reason why commit
> notifications fail.
>
> I've managed to merge the custom-tags of the site.xml; It's a complete merge
> of this section, not just fluidoSkin props for instance.
> For now that should be good enough, only in very very very rare cases this
> could add unwanted stuff.
> And yes: now we have a Google Search on these reskinned pages :D
>
> Tomorrow I'll have a look at multi module projects.
>
> -Robert
>> Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 20:37:18 +0100
>> From: and...@hammar.net
>> To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org
>> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] Using the new maven-fluido-skin for mojos
>>
>> I'll add Google Search to the mojo-parent and deploy a new snapshot.
>> We then need to wait for a new release of the skin with the external
>> links fix.
>>
>> /Anders
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 20:29, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@codehaus.org>
>> wrote:
>> > @Anders Sounds good to me. I'll have figure out a simple way to merge
>> > those
>> > custom properties for skins.
>> > @Olamy No I haven't. I'd expected a HAUS issue, but I can't find it. I
>> > can
>> > pick this up tomorrow (I'll have to leave soon)
>> >
>> > Simone has confirmed the issue with external links for top-bar and
>> > side-bar
>> > and will fix this tomorrow.
>> >
>> > -Robert
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 20:22:08 +0100
>> > From: ol...@apache.org
>> > To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org
>> > Subject: RE: [mojo-dev] Using the new maven-fluido-skin for mojos
>> >
>> >
>> > Super !!!
>> > Did you load any issue regarding missing commit email notif ?
>> > --
>> > Olivier
>> > Le 3 déc. 2011 19:56, "Robert Scholte" <rfscho...@codehaus.org> a
>> > écrit :
>> >
>> > As we all know: If you run a site-deploy on a project, all mojo-versions
>> > in
>> > the sitedocs will use the current snapshot.
>> > In the meantime I've created a new project called
>> > skinner-maven-plugin[1] to
>> > avoid this problem.
>> > With this plugin it should be possible to update our mojo-sites quite
>> > fast.
>> > It works like this:
>> > From the root of your mojo-project you can execute mvn skinner:skin
>> > This will check out the most recent version of the plugin.
>> > Next it will add/replace the skin of the site.xml with the one of the
>> > current project.
>> > So if you use mojo-parent-30-SNAPSHOT it will get the fluido-skin.
>> > Finally it will run a mvn site on this project so you can verify the
>> > result.
>> >
>> > Once we've picked a date to move to the fluido-skin we can do so.
>> >
>> > The plugin should already support multiple Locales.
>> > I haven't looked at multi-modules projects yet, neither have I included
>> > support for skin-specific custom properties.
>> >
>> > -Robert
>> >
>> > ps. Anyone knows a graphical designer who can refresh our mojo-logo?
>> >
>> > (I noticed we don't recieve scm-notifications anymore, so I had to
>> > spread
>> > the word this way)
>> >
>> > [1] http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/sandbox/skinner-maven-plugin/
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------
>> >> Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 14:57:49 +0100
>> >> From: and...@hammar.net
>> >> To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org
>> >> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] Using the new maven-fluido-skin for mojos
>> >>
>> >> > I tried the topbar menu, as looking at
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/skins/tags/maven-fluido-skin-1.0/src/main/resources/META-INF/maven/site.vm?view=markup
>> >> > it seems, that external links are only rendered when using this one.
>> >>
>> >> That seems weird. It must be possible to have external links with just
>> >> the sidebar menu. If not, would you mind submitting a ticket regarding
>> >> this on the skin so it can be fixed?
>> >> https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSKINS/
>> >>
>> >> /Anders
>> >>
>> >> > The position change of version and release date were accidentally as
>> >> > I
>> >> > did overwrite the tags without specifying the position. I like to
>> >> > have
>> >> > the time as well, so I see *when* I deployed the site :-).
>> >> >
>> >> > Personally I think the topbar is confusing and support sticking with
>> >> > the sidebar menu, however that external links are missing is a pity.
>> >> >
>> >> > I now just copy the dav.codehaus.org/images folder to
>> >> > dav.codehaus.org/fluido-preview/images, so your preview should
>> >> > include
>> >> > images :-).
>> >> >
>> >> > I render the ckjm-maven-plugin with and without topbar and sidebar
>> >> > beneath http://mojo.codehaus.org/fluido-preview/ so everyone might
>> >> > take a look :-)
>> >> >
>> >> > Regards Mirko
>> >> > --
>> >> > http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/
>> >> > https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/
>> >> > https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 21:57, Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> Regarding the topbar menu and the sidebar menu, I think we should
>> >> >> stick with the old layout of a left sidebar menu and no topbar menu.
>> >> >> We could include the Google Search feature by default.
>> >> >> What do others think?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Also, what do people think about the current logos in the fluido
>> >> >> skin?
>> >> >> I think that the Codehaus logo is fine and the Mojo one is ok, but
>> >> >> could possibly be improved (maybe just switch color). WDYT?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> /Anders
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 21:47, Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>> Right, I should have known that. I've been bit by that before.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> You've done some additional fluido skin config for the ckjm site,
>> >> >>> right? Added top bar menu and Google search? Also changed where
>> >> >>> publish date and version is displayed.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> /Anders
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 21:27, Mirko Friedenhagen
>> >> >>> <mfriedenha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>>> Hello Anders,
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> as all other sites (even for SNAPSHOTs of sandbox plugins) reside
>> >> >>>> directly beneath mojo.codehaus.org and the site plugin replaces
>> >> >>>> http://mojo.codehaus.org in links, you get:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> <img src="../images/mojo_logo.png" alt="Mojo">
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> which should probably be ../../images/mojo_logo.png or
>> >> >>>> /images/mojo_logo.png
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> I just site-deployed the site for the sandboxed ckjm-maven-plugin,
>> >> >>>> see:
>> >> >>>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/ckjm-maven-plugin/index.html
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> One thing which seems not to work correctly are external links: I
>> >> >>>> wanted to link to Spirellis' CKJM homepage (see
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> https://fisheye.codehaus.org/browse/~raw,r=15434/mojo/trunk/sandbox/ckjm-maven-plugin/src/site/site.xml)
>> >> >>>> but the link is not rendered at all.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> I am all for replacing the antique standard skin with the fluido
>> >> >>>> one
>> >> >>>> :-)
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Regards Mirko
>> >> >>>> --
>> >> >>>> http://illegalstateexception.blogspot.com/
>> >> >>>> https://github.com/mfriedenhagen/
>> >> >>>> https://bitbucket.org/mfriedenhagen/
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 20:58, Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net>
>> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>> As part of MOJO-1786, I've changed to the maven-fluido-skin in
>> >> >>>>> mojo-parent and deployed a new snapshot. Also, I've published an
>> >> >>>>> example mojo's site to:
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> http://mojo.codehaus.org/fluido-preview/jboss-packaging-maven-plugin/
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> I have absolutely no clue why the logos have been removed...:-)
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> /Anders
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 18:41, Robert Scholte
>> >> >>>>> <rfscho...@codehaus.org> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>> I agree, it shouldn't look like a collection of homepages ;)
>> >> >>>>>> The only thing I can think of is replacing one of the banner
>> >> >>>>>> images.
>> >> >>>>>> @Christopher, do you have concrete examples of you suggestion?
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>> -Robert
>> >> >>>>>>> Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:31:32 +0100
>> >> >>>>>>> From: and...@hammar.net
>> >> >>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> To: dev@mojo.codehaus.org
>> >> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] Using the new maven-fluido-skin for
>> >> >>>>>>> mojos
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> Regarding allowing each mojo to have their own skin, I'm not in
>> >> >>>>>>> favor
>> >> >>>>>>> of that. I think that all our mojos should have the same
>> >> >>>>>>> documentation
>> >> >>>>>>> look 'n' feel.
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> /Anders
>> >> >>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 22:26, Christopher Hunt
>> >> >>>>>>> <hu...@internode.on.net>
>> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>> > +1 to upgrade the MOJO to use this as a default set of skins.
>> >> >>>>>>> > They look
>> >> >>>>>>> > great.
>> >> >>>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>>> > In addition I feel that it would be nice to let plugin
>> >> >>>>>>> > authors
>> >> >>>>>>> > skin
>> >> >>>>>>> > their pages in different ways; perhaps via a vote.
>> >> >>>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>>> > On 29/11/2011, at 7:48 PM, Anders Hammar wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>>> >> An new skin, maven-fluido-skin [1], was recently released by
>> >> >>>>>>> >> the
>> >> >>>>>>> >> Apache Maven project. For the JAXB mojo, a patch submitter
>> >> >>>>>>> >> requested
>> >> >>>>>>> >> us to use that as he needs it for the documentation part.
>> >> >>>>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>>>> >> Should we use that for our mojos? Should we use a consistent
>> >> >>>>>>> >> skin for
>> >> >>>>>>> >> all mojos?
>> >> >>>>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>>>> >> Here's an example of using the new skin for a plugin:
>> >> >>>>>>> >> http://mybatis.org/maven-migration-plugin/
>> >> >>>>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>>>> >> /Anders
>> >> >>>>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>>>> >> [1] http://maven.apache.org/skins/maven-fluido-skin/
>> >> >>>>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>>>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>>>>>> >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> >> >>>>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>>>> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> >> >>>>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>>>> >>
>> >> >>>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>>>>>> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> >> >>>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>>> > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> >> >>>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>>> >
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> >> >
>> >> > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> >>
>> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to