Let me rephrase this a bit:I think what happened to the tomcat-maven-plugin is
a good thing: let the developers of the framework/webcontainer/tool/etc.
maintain their own Maven plugin. Most of the time you want to keep these in
sync.For instance: we're having quite some trouble to follow the pace of GWT.To
me your situation looks similar to the tomcat-situation. About the wagon-extra:
I thought the vfs-project is about InputStreams and OutputStreams, just like
the Wagon-project. But I can be wrong here. Robert > Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012
20:55:15 +0200
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [mojo-dev] Re: Intention to promote and release vfs-maven-plugin
> beta 1 and its sub components
>
> > Are you suggesting me to move the entire vfs-maven-plugin to github?
> > I am not ready to go there yet, this is where I comfortable with for years
> > and feedbacks and helps here are great.
>
> No. I was just saying that Mojo shouldn't be used just to get some jar
> to central. But it's a good place for a plugin that could be of
> interest for other people.
>
> /Anders
>
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > -Dan
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Anders Hammar <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I'm with Robert here. If you're just looking for some area to do
> >> releases from you should start your own Github account and use
> >> Sonatype OSSRH for syncing to central.
> >>
> >> /Anders
> >>
> >> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Robert Scholte <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi Dan,
> >>>
> >>> shouldn't vfs be something like wagon-extra?
> >>> What is your idea what will happen once commons-vfs is released? I cannot
> >>> imagine they'll make a maven-plugin as part of their release (that would
> >>> be
> >>> the first commons-project).
> >>> As you mentioned yourself: the packaging is now confusing, but that all
> >>> depends on the future of this plugin.
> >>> IMO codehaus shouldn't be used as a kickoff area if you're sure that this
> >>> is
> >>> not the final destination of the plugin.
> >>>
> >>> Robert
> >>>> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 10:35:58 -0700
> >>>> From: [email protected]
> >>>> To: [email protected]
> >>>> Subject: [mojo-dev] Re: Intention to promote and release vfs-maven-plugin
> >>>> beta 1 and its sub components
> >>>>
> >>>> ping,
> >>>>
> >>>> Looks like no objection on proceeding to release vfs-smb at codehaus :-)
> >>>>
> >>>> -D
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Dan Tran <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> > Hello,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > After a few months of testing internally, I would like to proceed with
> >>>> > the first beta release. However, I would like to open a discussion on
> >>>> > distribution of vfs-smb which is a fork from apacche's commons-vfs's
> >>>> > sandbox. This provider passes all of the generic test suite ( except
> >>>> > 2 related to classloader, may related to osgi requirements ), the
> >>>> > provider will not be release any time soon either.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > So I would like release vfs-smb at codehaus, keep the same java
> >>>> > package name, until commns-vfs officially release it
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Any objection for me do so, otherwise please provide alternative
> >>>> > solution
> >>>> >
> >>>> > big thanks ahead
> >>>> >
> >>>> > -Dan
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >>>>
> >>>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >>
> >> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> >
> > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
