On 8 March 2013 07:58, Tony Chemit <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 08:24:16 +0100
> Tony Chemit <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wonder how to push new signatures for java 1.7 (oracle, openjdk) in
> Central Maven since I do not see any with groupId
> org.codehaus.mojo.signature
> >
> > Is there a reason for that?
>

Nobody has stepped up to generate them


>
> I found this: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MANIMALSNIFFER-22 and
> http://mojo.codehaus.org/signatures
>
> I try to do some work on it (project is using animal-sniffer 1.4! seems
> pretty oldy ;)).
>

That was probably the version at the time


>
> Just to be sure, Is there any legal issue around Oracle stuff ? or not! ?
>

I don't see why a list of class names would have a legal issue.

Just need to be careful to differentiate between the public classes (i.e.
ones which any JRE 1.7 should have) and the private classes (i.e. the ones
in a specific JRE that are non-portable)


>
>
> --
> Tony Chemit
> --------------------
> tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28
> email: [email protected]
> http://www.codelutin.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>     
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_emai<http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email>
>

Reply via email to