On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 12:14:44 +0000 Stephen Connolly <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 8 March 2013 07:58, Tony Chemit <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 8 Mar 2013 08:24:16 +0100 > > Tony Chemit <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I wonder how to push new signatures for java 1.7 (oracle, openjdk) in > > Central Maven since I do not see any with groupId > > org.codehaus.mojo.signature > > > > > > Is there a reason for that? > > > > Nobody has stepped up to generate them oki-doki > > > > > > I found this: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MANIMALSNIFFER-22 and > > http://mojo.codehaus.org/signatures > > > > I try to do some work on it (project is using animal-sniffer 1.4! seems > > pretty oldy ;)). > > > > That was probably the version at the time Yep No argue about it ;) > > > > > > Just to be sure, Is there any legal issue around Oracle stuff ? or not! ? > > > > I don't see why a list of class names would have a legal issue. You never know with Oracle :( > > Just need to be careful to differentiate between the public classes (i.e. > ones which any JRE 1.7 should have) and the private classes (i.e. the ones > in a specific JRE that are non-portable) Ok we should then get a java17 (generic one) + java17-oracle + java17-openjdk ,... Is that right ? About public api, is there a nice place to get this ? I don't know a lot about since subject. Release -------- About release process, I suppose it is the same workflow as other mojo project ? I really like to do it next week if possible (release it I mean). Thanks for your help Stephen tony. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
