Do we want a Jenkins at CloudBees? Might be easier for people to grok? On Tuesday, 19 March 2013, Robert Scholte wrote:
> Let me go through all the jobs. > It looks to me something has changed, because I'm pretty sure I configured > notifications for failed builds and first successful to all committers > (users who have committed to the build) for every mojo job. > > No real need to keep checking Bamboo as long as its green ;) > > Robert > > > On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 22:57:52 +0100, Baptiste MATHUS <[email protected]> > wrote: > > FYI, I just committed the corresponding fix/evolution. CI is now back to >> green (thanks Mirko for noticing it, I'll watch it better next time). >> >> I'm gonna launch the 3rd try :-). >> >> Thanks >> >> >> 2013/3/17 Arnaud Héritier <[email protected]> >> >> I'm in favor to have just a warning. >>> It's enough >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Baptiste MATHUS <[email protected] >>> >wrote: >>> >>> Yup, I was just copying the code ;-). Thanks. >>>> >>>> Btw, I'm gonna just display a warning. But if you feel we should fail >>>> the >>>> build, just let me know. >>>> I feel this might be counter-productive to fail the build for that. >>>> People might in fact allow running 2.x and 3.x versions of maven on the >>>> same build, and failing here even if there's actually no cycle might >>>> make >>>> them just remove that rule (banCircularDependencies). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2013/3/17 Arnaud Héritier <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> The RequireMavenVersion Rule may help ? >>>>> >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/maven/enforcer/trunk/** >>>>> enforcer-rules/src/main/java/**org/apache/maven/plugins/** >>>>> enforcer/RequireMavenVersion.**java<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/enforcer/trunk/enforcer-rules/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/enforcer/RequireMavenVersion.java> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Baptiste MATHUS <[email protected] >>>>> >wrote: >>>>> >>>>> OK, I'll go that way. >>>>>> If anyone sees this message just now and knows *the right way to check >>>>>> the maven version in use in an enforcer rule, I'm interested.* >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2013/3/17 Mirko Friedenhagen <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>> I would prefer solution 1 and just document this behaviour (and set >>>>>> the Bamboo job to Maven 3). Otherwise you will have this switch in >>>>>> code, >>>>>> you should introduce two ITs, one with a failure status on Maven 3 >>>>>> and one >>>>>> with a skipped message on Maven 2. >>>>>> >>>>>> Honestly, new feature, new Maven should be no problem. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards Mirko >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Sent from my mobile >>>>>> On Mar 16, 2013 10:42 PM, "Baptiste MATHUS" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> In the circular IT, there's a circular dependency (now that's some >>>>>> news!). >>>>>> >>>>>> But M2 just ignores it silently, not M3. I think we hit >>>>>> http://jira.codehaus.org/**browse/MNG-1944<http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-1944> >>>>>> >>>>>> So, here we have an choice: either we >>>>>> 1) explicitly state (and check during execution?) that this rule can >>>>>> only be useful with M3 or >>>>>> 2) we simply remove it. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'd be for solution 1. I feel it's a valuable addition and as it >>>>>> works for the latest and greatest Maven, this makes sense to keep it. >>>>>> >>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2013/3/15 Baptiste MATHUS <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>> No problem, and true for the IT. >>>>>> I've copied the demo from the website and forgot to update that part. >>>>>> I can re-roll a release. Now that the hard part of configuring the >>>>>> machine, releasing is easy ;-). >>>>>> I'll re-roll now. >>>>>> >>>>>> Current vote canceled. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2013/3/15 Mirko Friedenhagen <[email protected]> >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello Baptiste, >>>>>> >>>>>> I updated the documentation and the corresponding tests for the >>>>>> required*Roles rules and think maybe we should roll a new version >>>>>> for >>>>>> this. And at least one of the integration tests will break (fixed in >>>>>> https://fisheye.codehaus.org/**changelog/mojo/?cs=18017<https://fisheye.codehaus.org/changelog/mojo/?cs=18017>), >>>>>> when you >>>>>> did >>>>>> not have a previous SNAPSHOT version built on your system :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> +0.5 >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards Mirko >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Fred Cooke <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> > +1 sounds interesting! >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:37 PM, Baptiste Mathus < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Hi, >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> I'd like to release version 1.0-alpha-4 of the >>>>>> extra-enforcer-rules >>>>>> >> project. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Extra Enforcer Rules is a project containing extra rules for >>>>>> Apache >>>>>> >> Maven's Enforcer Plugin. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> We solved 7 issues: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> https://jira.codehaus.org/**secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?** >>>>>> projectId=11062&version=18450<https://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11062&version=18450> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> https://jira.codehaus.org/**issues/?jql=project%20%3D%** >>>>>> 20MOJO%20AND%20component%20%**3D%20extra-enforcer-rules%** >>>>>> 20AND%20resolution%20%3D%**20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%** >>>>>> 20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%**20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC<https://jira.codehaus.org/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20MOJO%20AND%20component%20%3D%20extra-enforcer-rules%20AND%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Staging Repositories: >>>>>> >> General: >>>>>> >> https://nexus.codehaus.org/**content/groups/staging/<https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/staging/> >>>>>> >> Exclusive: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> https://nexus.codehaus.org/**content/repositories/** >>>>>> orgcodehausmojo-031/<https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/orgcodehausmojo-031/> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> (Staging) Site: >>>>>> >> http://mojo.codehaus.org/**extra-enforcer-rules/<http://mojo.codehaus.org/extra-enforcer-rules/> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> SCM Tag: >>>>>> >> >>>>>> https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/**tags/extra-enforcer-rules-1.0-** >>>>>> alpha-4/<https://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/extra-enforcer-rules-1.0-alpha-4/> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Note that this version includes two new rules: >>>>>> >> * enforcerBytecodeVersion : rule to check t >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net >>>> Sauvez un arbre, >>>> Mangez un castor ! >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- > Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/**manage_email<http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email> > > > -- Sent from my phone
