Hi all, As a followup, I tried to "clean verify" the rpm-maven-plugin with many different ways since last week. I've never been able to have all the ITs pass...
The funny thing is that this is on my current Kubuntu and rpm apt-get'd that I had the smallest number of failing IT (only one "rpm-1")... I tried at work with RHEL5 CI nodes. I just tried with an EC2 instance I installed with a fresh 64 bits RHEL6.x. There I get 6 errors on 7 ITs... Is there anyone that could just try running mvn clean verify inside the rpm-maven-plugin (better with some system with rpm command, like fedora, mandriva, centos, rhel and so on), and tell me if they're able to have the IT passing. I'd really like not to have to give up with trying to handle this release, but I'm a bit stuck. Wondering if this is those ITs that are fragile and somehow dependent on something restrictive (rpm command version or something), or if this is me doing something wrong somewhere. What I checked: * Bamboo-CI is OK. I'd be curious which system it's running. * I tried with m221 and m305, doesn't change anything. * RHEL5&RHEL6 KO for me. * did only try with 64 bits. Might be something specific to 32 bits? Anyone having 5 minutes at least to check if they're able to clean verify that plugin on their box? Thanks a lot. 2013/6/26 Baptiste MATHUS <bmat...@batmat.net> > Hi Rickard, > > Thanks a lot for your efforts. > Unfortunately, I was unable to apply the MRPM-141 patch, even if I svn up > -r18277 before. > It gives many conflicts. > > Note that I was able to apply the one of MRPM-137 without any issue. > > I'll have another look this evening I think. > > Cheers > > > 2013/6/26 Rickard von Essen <rickard.von.es...@gmail.com> > >> You can ignore *MRPM-137*, it's unrelated. I have verified that I get >> the same error as you on Ubuntu Server. With out debugging it in detail I'm >> quite sure it's the *org.codehaus.mojo.unix:unix-rpm* library that fails >> to parse the output of *rpm -qlvp <RPM>. * >> * >> * >> I rewrote the Integration Tests to only use groovy + rpm and not depend >> on unix-rpm. Applying that patch http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRPM-141 all >> tests passes also on Debian based distros. >> >> // Rickard >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Rickard von Essen < >> rickard.von.es...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I hade planed to do some work on the rpm plug. But currently I'm pulling >>> two jobs so it hade to wait a while. >>> >>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRPM-137 might fix the IT for >>> you. I use vagrant to verify that everything works in CentOS while >>> developing on OS X. I attach my Vagrantfile. >>> >>> Happy hacking! >>> >>> // Rickard >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Baptiste MATHUS <bmat...@batmat.net>wrote: >>> >>>> That's exactly what I was trying to do :). >>>> The thing is, I thought afterwards, I haven't an rpm-based system. I'm >>>> running kubuntu. So I installed rpm through apt-get. I don't if this is >>>> known to have issues. >>>> >>>> FYI, in fact, I fear things aren't going to run totally smoothly since >>>> I'm already running into an IT failure (rpm-1): >>>> " post-build script did not succeed. /usr/myusr/app/bin/filter.txt does >>>> not exist " >>>> >>>> I'm gonna have to dig a bit here. If necessary, I guess I'll install >>>> some VM running RH or do it from some machine at work, but I'm not yet even >>>> sure the IT wouldn't fail there too. >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2013/6/25 Mirko Friedenhagen <mfriedenha...@gmail.com> >>>> >>>>> Hello Baptiste, >>>>> >>>>> I think it would be great you made the release-manager. I would >>>>> suggest a SNAPSHOT deploy of the trunk with the fix and Daniels >>>>> confirmation, that the fix worked for him before, though. >>>>> >>>>> Regards Mirko >>>>> -- >>>>> Sent from my mobile >>>>> On Jun 25, 2013 6:11 PM, "Baptiste Mathus" <bmat...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> No timeline. But though I personally dont use this plugin, if nobody >>>>>> steps up/objects I can do it those days. >>>>>> If the bug is already fixed, that seems quite an easy task to provide >>>>>> users satisfaction. >>>>>> >>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> Le 25 juin 2013 17:54, "Daniel Lipofsky" <dlipof...@gmail.com> a >>>>>> écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> 2.1-alpha-2 was released Aug 2012, and I know there is at least 1 >>>>>>> bug fix since then that I am interested in, so I was wondering if there >>>>>>> is >>>>>>> a timeline for this. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Dan >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net >>>> Sauvez un arbre, >>>> Mangez un castor ! >>>> >>> >>> >> > > > -- > Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net > Sauvez un arbre, > Mangez un castor ! > -- Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net Sauvez un arbre, Mangez un castor !
