Le 2 juil. 2013 14:47, "Rickard von Essen" <rickard.von.es...@gmail.com> a
écrit :
>
> Disable it.

Done.

>
> I'll try to update my patch for all IT's after the summer and commit it.
It will produce more robust results.
> The total failure on rhel might just be missing rpm-build package?

Good question. I suppose we could add something like an dedicated enforcer
rule to check for rpm command presence (and maybe some basic options tests).

>
> // Rickard
>
> (Where do I get the 2.1-alpha-3-SNAPSHOT from?)

See
https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/snapshots-group/org/codehaus/mojo/rpm-maven-plugin/2.1-alpha-3-SNAPSHOT/

>
>
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:53 PM, Baptiste Mathus <bmat...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just went ahead and disabled rpm-1.
>>
>> Then I deployed a 2.1-alpha-3-SNAPSHOT in the go.
>>
>> Can someone test it?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> 2013/6/30 Baptiste Mathus <bmat...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Thanks for the insights. In the meantime, I've asked on Twitter for
people to test "mvn clean verify":
>>> * Fedora 18 : rpm-1 failing https://gist.github.com/looztra/5891905
>>> * centos 6.4 : rpm-1 failing https://gist.github.com/hgomez/5891894
>>> * rhel 5.9 on ec2 : even worse ?!?
https://gist.github.com/Batmat/5892567
>>> * rhel 6.x on ec2 : same as 5.9
>>>
>>> So to try keeping us moving forward, I propose the following: let's
just remove/disable that rpm-1 test and try a release.
>>>
>>> If there's some regression in the go, then I just think we'll have to
invest a bit on ITs so that they're less random anyway.
>>>
>>> What do you all think?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Le 30 juin 2013 00:30, "Rickard von Essen" <rickard.von.es...@gmail.com>
a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On CentOS 6.3
>>>> rpm-1 failes with AssertionError: /usr/myusr/app/bin/filter.txt ...
>>>>
>>>> Last time I checked IT's was not running on Bamboo.
>>>>
>>>> I did some debugging of this some months ago and if I remember
correctly it seems like rpm cleans a up some files that the test is trying
to check.
>>>>
>>>> A general problem with the integration tests is that they don't really
check the rpm sometime but some temporary files.
>>>>
>>>> Reagards
>>>> Rickard
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Anders Hammar <and...@hammar.net>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried "mvn clean verify" on my MBP and IT #1 fails, but that's a
know issue with mac and the library we're using for checking the rpm
content.
>>>>>
>>>>> [INFO] Building: rpm-1/pom.xml
>>>>> [INFO] ..FAILED (6.9 s)
>>>>> [INFO]   The post-build script did not succeed. OS name script
missing, expected: name-Mac OS X.sh
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's my setup:
>>>>> Apache Maven 3.1.0-alpha-1 (c726cdd3a9ad5c3a419e1171f8c1925e336ead18;
2013-06-01 15:03:28+0200)
>>>>> Java version: 1.6.0_45, vendor: Apple Inc.
>>>>>
>>>>> The funny thing is that I could have sworn I installed JDK 1.7 the
other day...
>>>>>
>>>>> /Anders
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Baptiste MATHUS <bmat...@batmat.net>
wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As a followup, I tried to "clean verify" the rpm-maven-plugin with
many different ways since last week.
>>>>>> I've never been able to have all the ITs pass...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The funny thing is that this is on my current Kubuntu and rpm
apt-get'd that I had the smallest number of failing IT (only one "rpm-1")...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I tried at work with RHEL5 CI nodes. I just tried with an EC2
instance I installed with a fresh 64 bits RHEL6.x.
>>>>>> There I get 6 errors on 7 ITs...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there anyone that could just try running mvn clean verify inside
the rpm-maven-plugin (better with some system with rpm command, like
fedora, mandriva, centos, rhel and so on), and tell me if they're able to
have the IT passing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd really like not to have to give up with trying to handle this
release, but I'm a bit stuck.
>>>>>> Wondering if this is those ITs that are fragile and somehow
dependent on something restrictive (rpm command version or something), or
if this is me doing something wrong somewhere.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What I checked:
>>>>>> * Bamboo-CI is OK. I'd be curious which system it's running.
>>>>>> * I tried with m221 and m305, doesn't change anything.
>>>>>> * RHEL5&RHEL6 KO for me.
>>>>>> * did only try with 64 bits. Might be something specific to 32 bits?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone having 5 minutes at least to check if they're able to clean
verify that plugin on their box?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks a lot.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2013/6/26 Baptiste MATHUS <bmat...@batmat.net>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Rickard,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks a lot for your efforts.
>>>>>>> Unfortunately, I was unable to apply the MRPM-141 patch, even if I
svn up -r18277 before.
>>>>>>> It gives many conflicts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Note that I was able to apply the one of MRPM-137 without any issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll have another look this evening I think.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2013/6/26 Rickard von Essen <rickard.von.es...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You can ignore MRPM-137, it's unrelated. I have verified that I
get the same error as you on Ubuntu Server. With out debugging it in detail
I'm quite sure it's the org.codehaus.mojo.unix:unix-rpm library that fails
to parse the output of rpm -qlvp <RPM>.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I rewrote the Integration Tests to only use groovy + rpm and not
depend on unix-rpm. Applying that patch
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRPM-141 all tests passes also on Debian
based distros.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> // Rickard
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Rickard von Essen <
rickard.von.es...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I hade planed to do some work on the rpm plug. But currently I'm
pulling two jobs so it hade to wait a while.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRPM-137 might fix the IT
for you. I use vagrant to verify that everything works in CentOS while
developing on OS X. I attach my Vagrantfile.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Happy hacking!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> // Rickard
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Baptiste MATHUS <
bmat...@batmat.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> That's exactly what I was trying to do :).
>>>>>>>>>> The thing is, I thought afterwards, I haven't an rpm-based
system. I'm running kubuntu. So I installed rpm through apt-get. I don't if
this is known to have issues.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> FYI, in fact, I fear things aren't going to run totally smoothly
since I'm already running into an IT failure (rpm-1):
>>>>>>>>>> " post-build script did not succeed.
/usr/myusr/app/bin/filter.txt does not exist "
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm gonna have to dig a bit here. If necessary, I guess I'll
install some VM running RH or do it from some machine at work, but I'm not
yet even sure the IT wouldn't fail there too.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2013/6/25 Mirko Friedenhagen <mfriedenha...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Baptiste,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think it would be great you made the release-manager. I would
suggest a SNAPSHOT deploy of the trunk with the fix and Daniels
confirmation, that the fix worked for him before, though.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards Mirko
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my mobile
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Jun 25, 2013 6:11 PM, "Baptiste Mathus" <bmat...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> No timeline. But though I personally dont use this plugin, if
nobody steps up/objects I can do it those days.
>>>>>>>>>>>> If the bug is already fixed, that seems quite an easy task to
provide users satisfaction.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 25 juin 2013 17:54, "Daniel Lipofsky" <dlipof...@gmail.com>
a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.1-alpha-2 was released Aug 2012, and I know there is at
least 1 bug fix since then that I am interested in, so I was wondering if
there is a timeline for this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net
>>>>>>>>>> Sauvez un arbre,
>>>>>>>>>> Mangez un castor !
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net
>>>>>>> Sauvez un arbre,
>>>>>>> Mangez un castor !
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net
>>>>>> Sauvez un arbre,
>>>>>> Mangez un castor !
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Baptiste <Batmat> MATHUS - http://batmat.net
>> Sauvez un arbre,
>> Mangez un castor !
>
>

Reply via email to