That's it. See http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#LazyConsensus for precisions.
I guess the few responses are because of the summertime and holiday. Basically, once the three days are off, the RM (release manager, you in this case) can then proceed to what he announced. And btw the RM can also decide to delay a few more the action if he wants to get more feedback. I'm currently not easily accessing a computer. Did you triple check this time you didn't compiled for jdk7 bytecode? Which target version did you settle on for the plugin? I think that'll be an important information to remind in the announcement mail. Cheers Le 18 août 2013 09:51, "Lennart Jörelid" <lennart.jore...@gmail.com> a écrit : > I'd say yes - that would be the essence of "lazy" consensus. > While I haven't had a chance to test out the new release of the Cobertura > Maven Plugin yet, I'd simply add my > > +1 > > for good measure here. > > :) > > > > 2013/8/18 Steven Christou <schristo...@gmail.com> > >> It has been over 72 hours and the cobertura maven plugin didn't receive >> any vote. What would be the next step? Should I perform a release with a >> lazy consensus? >> >> Thanks, >> Steve. >> >> >> On 08/14/2013 09:03 PM, Steven Christou wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to release version 2.6 of the Cobertura-Maven-Plugin >> >> This plugin provides the features of Cobertura within the Maven 2 & 3 >> environment. >> >> We solved 2 issues: >> Release Notes - Maven 2.x Cobertura Plugin - Version 2.6 >> ** Improvement >> * [MCOBERTURA-175] - Upgrade to Cobertura 2.0 >> * [MCOBERTURA-176] - Add support for new feature IgnoreTrivial and >> IgnoreMethodAnnotation in cobertura 2.0 (Thank you David Ignjic) >> >> There were a number of issues that were in the previous version of >> cobertura which have been fixed for this release. To see a complete list, >> go to: >> https://github.com/cobertura/cobertura/issues?milestone=1&state=closed >> https://github.com/cobertura/cobertura/issues/18 >> https://github.com/cobertura/cobertura/issues/9 >> The plugin will be using version 2.0.3 of cobertura. >> >> Robert had mentioned a performance issue that was in the current version >> of cobertura. I am aware of the issue and on the next release of cobertura >> I will try to address the issue. >> >> Staging Repositories: >> General: <https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/staging/> >> https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/groups/staging/org/codehaus/mojo/cobertura-maven-plugin/2.6/ >> Exclusive: >> https://nexus.codehaus.org/content/repositories/orgcodehausmojo-106/org/codehaus/mojo/cobertura-maven-plugin/2.6/ >> >> (Staging) Site: >> https://dav.codehaus.org/mojo/cobertura-maven-plugin/ >> >> (Current) Site: >> http://mojo.codehaus.org/cobertura-maven-plugin/ >> >> SCM Tag: >> http://svn.codehaus.org/mojo/tags/cobertura-maven-plugin-2.6/ >> >> ADDITIONAL_INFORMATION >> >> [ ] +1 >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1 >> >> The vote is open for 72 hours and will succeed by lazy consensus. >> >> >> >> Regards Cheers >> >> Steven Christou >> >> >> > > > -- > > -- > +==============================+ > | Bästa hälsningar, > | [sw. "Best regards"] > | > | Lennart Jörelid > | EAI Architect & Integrator > | > | jGuru Europe AB > | Mölnlycke - Kista > | > | Email: l...@jguru.se > | URL: www.jguru.se > | Phone > | (skype): jgurueurope > | (intl): +46 708 507 603 > | (domestic): 0708 - 507 603 > +==============================+ > >
