Re: [mojo-dev] trouble with OSSHR and flatten-maven-plugin

[Jörg Hohwiller]

Am 01.05.2014 20:47, schrieb Karl Heinz Marbaise:

Hi Jörg,

Hi Karl-Heinz,

>>> I kept some of these informations but removed them after suggestions

from Robert.

When did you suggested this?

I do not want any finger-pointing and I did not suggested this from my
wisdom foreseeing this trouble before.
It was just on incidence that I had most of these required attributes in
before...
So what I was talking about is this discussion:
http://markmail.org/message/wbbzjupqnnbn7w7d

Sorry if this could be misunderstood...i just want to know the reasons for doing so and to discuss the things here...nothing more (sorry for that).

No worries. I think the initial reason was to realize the idea of the consumer POM as originated for Maven Model 5.0.0.

That was IMHO the main driver for the decision.

As we renamed the plugin and go for a pragmatical and explorative approach, we will focus on a solution that addresses the demands and needs maven users have today to do their work.

OK. I already guessed it :)

Or is flatten-maven-plugin wrong or should at least offer an option to
keep "OSS/project development info"?

Sounds like so. I would suggest to make such option which leads to
true by default.

I will add such option. For the default I would like to hear Roberts
opinion as well...

That's why we are talking on this mailing list about this...

:)

Kind regards
Karl-Heinz Marbaise

Cheers
  Jörg

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature