+1 for MojoHaus

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr> wrote:
> then we have a few proposals:
> - Mojo Extras
> - MojoHaus
> - The Mojo Project
>
>
> I really like MojoHaus
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le mardi 10 mars 2015 09:28:59 vous avez écrit :
>> I think it's a bad idea to not include the "Mojo" name in some form. The
>> project has been around for over 10 years now and it widely known and used
>> in the Maven community.
>>
>> I think Mojo Extras is a good name, I would like to propose "The Mojo
>> Project".
>> > ok, another idea: Mojo Extras (I just reserved the github org)
>> >
>> > = Mojo (ie plugins for Maven) that can't be hosted at ASF for license
>> > issues, or generally less strict rules about anything (which comes at a
>> > price: this is not a foundation, no dev protection, or anything the rules
>> > are done for)
>> >
>> >
>> > I'm not trying anything to replace Codehaus name itself, because Codehaus
>> > is really wide
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Hervé
>> >
>> > Le jeudi 5 mars 2015 15:51:03 vous avez écrit :
>> > > Hello Hervé,
>> > >
>> > > I would suggest that "mojo" is quite unknown for most developers (who
>> > > are
>> > > non-maven-plugin developers) out there.
>> > > Few would even contemplate calling the plugins by their full - or even
>> > > abbreviated - name.
>> > > Whenever I hear people talking about a plugin, they simply say "the
>> > > aspectj
>> > > plugin" or equivalent.
>> > > Not "the aspectj-maven-plugin" - and definitely not "Mojo's
>> > > aspectj-maven-plugin".
>> > >
>> > > Hence, I don't think that the Mojo "brand" is well-known at all
>> > > (actually,
>> > > it is more confusing since it can be mixed up with the name of the Mojo
>> > > interface and AbstractMojo implementation).
>> > > I don't even believe that the "Codehaus" brand is well-known to the
>> > > genereal development community.
>> > > If anything, the names of the plugins themselves *could* be known.
>> > >
>> > > So ... if we are going to refactor the Codehaus codebase and
>> > > organisation,
>> > > let's do it to best match the future demands.
>> > >
>> > > I would also suggest being *very* clear about presenting the reason that
>> > > the Codehaus/Mojo project develops Maven plugins instead of the projects
>> > > themselves.
>> > > For example - it would seem apparent that the AspectJ project should
>> > > develop an aspectj-maven-plugin.
>> > > However, that plugin is developed by Codehaus, and I believe that we
>> > > should
>> > > be a bit clearer in documenting why.
>> > >
>> > > Fair?
>> > >
>> > > 2015-03-05 9:24 GMT+01:00 Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr>:
>> > > > Le mercredi 4 mars 2015 14:16:08 vous avez écrit :
>> > > > > *Project name*
>> > > > > May not be a concern, but that needs to be cleared out sooner than
>> > > > > later.
>> > > > > I think that one of the most pressing subject may indeed not be
>> > > > > technical
>> > > > > but about the name of our project: what name should/could we use for
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > project.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Should/could it stay "'Codehaus Mojo" on GitHub even after Codehaus
>> > > > > EOL
>> > > > > (meaning we'd certainly use https://github.com/codehaus-mojo org)?
>> > > > > or
>> > > > > "Maven Mojo" (which would make googling for it quite difficult btw)?
>> > > > > Or
>> > > > > change the project name even more?
>> > > >
>> > > > -1 to "Maven Mojo": trademark concern on Maven (Apache Maven, to be
>> > > > precise)
>> > > > could be "Mojo for Maven"
>> > > >
>> > > > why not just "Mojo" as the project name?
>> > > > AFAIK, it has become a well known name lately: is there really a need
>> > > > for
>> > > > "XXX
>> > > > Mojo", whatever XXX is?
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards,
>> > > >
>> > > > Hervé
>> > > >
>> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >
>> > > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> > > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>



-- 
Dennis Lundberg

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to