On 3/12/15 11:05 AM, Rickard von Essen wrote:
> +1 for MojoHaus if Codehaus is not applicable.

+1 for MojoHaus. We might want to have a statement like "formerly known
as Mojo Codehaus" on our website.

/Alex

> 
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Arnaud Héritier
> <aherit...@codehaus.org <mailto:aherit...@codehaus.org>> wrote:
> 
>     +1 for MojoHaus
> 
>     On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Tony Chemit <che...@codelutin.com
>     <mailto:che...@codelutin.com>> wrote:
> 
>         On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 08:54:09 +0100
>         Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr
>         <mailto:herve.bout...@free.fr>> wrote:
> 
>         +1 MojoHaus
> 
>         > then we have a few proposals:
>         > - Mojo Extras
>         > - MojoHaus
>         > - The Mojo Project
>         >
>         >
>         > I really like MojoHaus
>         >
>         > Regards,
>         >
>         > Hervé
>         >
>         > Le mardi 10 mars 2015 09:28:59 vous avez écrit :
>         > > I think it's a bad idea to not include the "Mojo" name in
>         some form. The
>         > > project has been around for over 10 years now and it widely
>         known and used
>         > > in the Maven community.
>         > >
>         > > I think Mojo Extras is a good name, I would like to propose
>         "The Mojo
>         > > Project".
>         > > > ok, another idea: Mojo Extras (I just reserved the github org)
>         > > >
>         > > > = Mojo (ie plugins for Maven) that can't be hosted at ASF
>         for license
>         > > > issues, or generally less strict rules about anything
>         (which comes at a
>         > > > price: this is not a foundation, no dev protection, or
>         anything the rules
>         > > > are done for)
>         > > >
>         > > >
>         > > > I'm not trying anything to replace Codehaus name itself,
>         because Codehaus
>         > > > is really wide
>         > > >
>         > > > Regards,
>         > > >
>         > > > Hervé
>         > > >
>         > > > Le jeudi 5 mars 2015 15:51:03 vous avez écrit :
>         > > > > Hello Hervé,
>         > > > >
>         > > > > I would suggest that "mojo" is quite unknown for most
>         developers (who
>         > > > > are
>         > > > > non-maven-plugin developers) out there.
>         > > > > Few would even contemplate calling the plugins by their
>         full - or even
>         > > > > abbreviated - name.
>         > > > > Whenever I hear people talking about a plugin, they
>         simply say "the
>         > > > > aspectj
>         > > > > plugin" or equivalent.
>         > > > > Not "the aspectj-maven-plugin" - and definitely not "Mojo's
>         > > > > aspectj-maven-plugin".
>         > > > >
>         > > > > Hence, I don't think that the Mojo "brand" is well-known
>         at all
>         > > > > (actually,
>         > > > > it is more confusing since it can be mixed up with the
>         name of the Mojo
>         > > > > interface and AbstractMojo implementation).
>         > > > > I don't even believe that the "Codehaus" brand is
>         well-known to the
>         > > > > genereal development community.
>         > > > > If anything, the names of the plugins themselves *could*
>         be known.
>         > > > >
>         > > > > So ... if we are going to refactor the Codehaus codebase and
>         > > > > organisation,
>         > > > > let's do it to best match the future demands.
>         > > > >
>         > > > > I would also suggest being *very* clear about presenting
>         the reason that
>         > > > > the Codehaus/Mojo project develops Maven plugins instead
>         of the projects
>         > > > > themselves.
>         > > > > For example - it would seem apparent that the AspectJ
>         project should
>         > > > > develop an aspectj-maven-plugin.
>         > > > > However, that plugin is developed by Codehaus, and I
>         believe that we
>         > > > > should
>         > > > > be a bit clearer in documenting why.
>         > > > >
>         > > > > Fair?
>         > > > >
>         > > > > 2015-03-05 9:24 GMT+01:00 Hervé BOUTEMY
>         <herve.bout...@free.fr <mailto:herve.bout...@free.fr>>:
>         > > > > > Le mercredi 4 mars 2015 14:16:08 vous avez écrit :
>         > > > > > > *Project name*
>         > > > > > > May not be a concern, but that needs to be cleared
>         out sooner than
>         > > > > > > later.
>         > > > > > > I think that one of the most pressing subject may
>         indeed not be
>         > > > > > > technical
>         > > > > > > but about the name of our project: what name
>         should/could we use for
>         > > > > > > the
>         > > > > > > project.
>         > > > > > >
>         > > > > > > Should/could it stay "'Codehaus Mojo" on GitHub even
>         after Codehaus
>         > > > > > > EOL
>         > > > > > > (meaning we'd certainly use
>         https://github.com/codehaus-mojo org)?
>         > > > > > > or
>         > > > > > > "Maven Mojo" (which would make googling for it quite
>         difficult btw)?
>         > > > > > > Or
>         > > > > > > change the project name even more?
>         > > > > >
>         > > > > > -1 to "Maven Mojo": trademark concern on Maven (Apache
>         Maven, to be
>         > > > > > precise)
>         > > > > > could be "Mojo for Maven"
>         > > > > >
>         > > > > > why not just "Mojo" as the project name?
>         > > > > > AFAIK, it has become a well known name lately: is
>         there really a need
>         > > > > > for
>         > > > > > "XXX
>         > > > > > Mojo", whatever XXX is?
>         > > > > >
>         > > > > > Regards,
>         > > > > >
>         > > > > > Hervé
>         > > > > >
>         > > > > >
>         ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>         > > > > >
>         > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>         > > > > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>         > > >
>         > > >
>         ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>         > > >
>         > > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>         > > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>         > >
>         > >
>         ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>         > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>         > >
>         > >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>         > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>         >
>         >     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>         >
>         >
> 
> 
> 
>         --
>         Tony Chemit
>         --------------------
>         tél: +33 (0) 2 40 50 29 28
>         <tel:%2B33%20%280%29%202%2040%2050%2029%2028>
>         http://www.codelutin.com
>         email: che...@codelutin.com <mailto:che...@codelutin.com>
>         twitter: https://twitter.com/tchemit
> 
>         ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>         To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> 
>             http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Alexandre COLLIGNON<alexan...@collign.net>
https://keybase.io/acollign
https://plus.google.com/+AlexandreCOLLIGNON/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email


Reply via email to