That name must have been my largest contribution to the cause so far :)
--
Sergei
>
>Saturday, 14 March 2015 12:43 +0000 from Hervé BOUTEMY
><herve.bout...@free.fr>:
>ok, we have a clear winner: MojoHaus
>(and we'll have a statement like "formerly known as Codehaus Mojo project" on
>our website once migrated)
>I created the github organization: https://github.com/MojoHaus
>what are the next steps?
>Regards,
>Hervé
>Le mercredi 11 mars 2015 08:54:09 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit :
>> then we have a few proposals:
>> - Mojo Extras
>> - MojoHaus
>> - The Mojo Project
>>
>>
>> I really like MojoHaus
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Hervé
>>
>> Le mardi 10 mars 2015 09:28:59 vous avez écrit :
>> > I think it's a bad idea to not include the "Mojo" name in some form. The
>> > project has been around for over 10 years now and it widely known and used
>> > in the Maven community.
>> >
>> > I think Mojo Extras is a good name, I would like to propose "The Mojo
>> > Project".
>> >
>> > > ok, another idea: Mojo Extras (I just reserved the github org)
>> > >
>> > > = Mojo (ie plugins for Maven) that can't be hosted at ASF for license
>> > > issues, or generally less strict rules about anything (which comes at a
>> > > price: this is not a foundation, no dev protection, or anything the
>> > > rules
>> > > are done for)
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I'm not trying anything to replace Codehaus name itself, because
>> > > Codehaus
>> > > is really wide
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > >
>> > > Hervé
>> > >
>> > > Le jeudi 5 mars 2015 15:51:03 vous avez écrit :
>> > > > Hello Hervé,
>> > > >
>> > > > I would suggest that "mojo" is quite unknown for most developers (who
>> > > > are
>> > > > non-maven-plugin developers) out there.
>> > > > Few would even contemplate calling the plugins by their full - or even
>> > > > abbreviated - name.
>> > > > Whenever I hear people talking about a plugin, they simply say "the
>> > > > aspectj
>> > > > plugin" or equivalent.
>> > > > Not "the aspectj-maven-plugin" - and definitely not "Mojo's
>> > > > aspectj-maven-plugin".
>> > > >
>> > > > Hence, I don't think that the Mojo "brand" is well-known at all
>> > > > (actually,
>> > > > it is more confusing since it can be mixed up with the name of the
>> > > > Mojo
>> > > > interface and AbstractMojo implementation).
>> > > > I don't even believe that the "Codehaus" brand is well-known to the
>> > > > genereal development community.
>> > > > If anything, the names of the plugins themselves *could* be known.
>> > > >
>> > > > So ... if we are going to refactor the Codehaus codebase and
>> > > > organisation,
>> > > > let's do it to best match the future demands.
>> > > >
>> > > > I would also suggest being *very* clear about presenting the reason
>> > > > that
>> > > > the Codehaus/Mojo project develops Maven plugins instead of the
>> > > > projects
>> > > > themselves.
>> > > > For example - it would seem apparent that the AspectJ project should
>> > > > develop an aspectj-maven-plugin.
>> > > > However, that plugin is developed by Codehaus, and I believe that we
>> > > > should
>> > > > be a bit clearer in documenting why.
>> > > >
>> > > > Fair?
>> > > >
>> > > > 2015-03-05 9:24 GMT+01:00 Hervé BOUTEMY < herve.bout...@free.fr >:
>> > > > > Le mercredi 4 mars 2015 14:16:08 vous avez écrit :
>> > > > > > *Project name*
>> > > > > > May not be a concern, but that needs to be cleared out sooner than
>> > > > > > later.
>> > > > > > I think that one of the most pressing subject may indeed not be
>> > > > > > technical
>> > > > > > but about the name of our project: what name should/could we use
>> > > > > > for
>> > > > > > the
>> > > > > > project.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Should/could it stay "'Codehaus Mojo" on GitHub even after
>> > > > > > Codehaus
>> > > > > > EOL
>> > > > > > (meaning we'd certainly use https://github.com/codehaus-mojo org)?
>> > > > > > or
>> > > > > > "Maven Mojo" (which would make googling for it quite difficult
>> > > > > > btw)?
>> > > > > > Or
>> > > > > > change the project name even more?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > -1 to "Maven Mojo": trademark concern on Maven (Apache Maven, to be
>> > > > > precise)
>> > > > > could be "Mojo for Maven"
>> > > > >
>> > > > > why not just "Mojo" as the project name?
>> > > > > AFAIK, it has become a well known name lately: is there really a
>> > > > > need
>> > > > > for
>> > > > > "XXX
>> > > > > Mojo", whatever XXX is?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Regards,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Hervé
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > -
>> > > > >
>> > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >
>> > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>> > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
