Hello Hervé, All right; move to the next MojoHaus incarnation. Would you please add me as well (https://github.com/lennartj)
2015-03-14 13:43 GMT+01:00 Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr>: > ok, we have a clear winner: MojoHaus > (and we'll have a statement like "formerly known as Codehaus Mojo project" > on > our website once migrated) > > > I created the github organization: https://github.com/MojoHaus > > what are the next steps? > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le mercredi 11 mars 2015 08:54:09 Hervé BOUTEMY a écrit : > > then we have a few proposals: > > - Mojo Extras > > - MojoHaus > > - The Mojo Project > > > > > > I really like MojoHaus > > > > Regards, > > > > Hervé > > > > Le mardi 10 mars 2015 09:28:59 vous avez écrit : > > > I think it's a bad idea to not include the "Mojo" name in some form. > The > > > project has been around for over 10 years now and it widely known and > used > > > in the Maven community. > > > > > > I think Mojo Extras is a good name, I would like to propose "The Mojo > > > Project". > > > > > > > ok, another idea: Mojo Extras (I just reserved the github org) > > > > > > > > = Mojo (ie plugins for Maven) that can't be hosted at ASF for license > > > > issues, or generally less strict rules about anything (which comes > at a > > > > price: this is not a foundation, no dev protection, or anything the > > > > rules > > > > are done for) > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not trying anything to replace Codehaus name itself, because > > > > Codehaus > > > > is really wide > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Hervé > > > > > > > > Le jeudi 5 mars 2015 15:51:03 vous avez écrit : > > > > > Hello Hervé, > > > > > > > > > > I would suggest that "mojo" is quite unknown for most developers > (who > > > > > are > > > > > non-maven-plugin developers) out there. > > > > > Few would even contemplate calling the plugins by their full - or > even > > > > > abbreviated - name. > > > > > Whenever I hear people talking about a plugin, they simply say "the > > > > > aspectj > > > > > plugin" or equivalent. > > > > > Not "the aspectj-maven-plugin" - and definitely not "Mojo's > > > > > aspectj-maven-plugin". > > > > > > > > > > Hence, I don't think that the Mojo "brand" is well-known at all > > > > > (actually, > > > > > it is more confusing since it can be mixed up with the name of the > > > > > Mojo > > > > > interface and AbstractMojo implementation). > > > > > I don't even believe that the "Codehaus" brand is well-known to the > > > > > genereal development community. > > > > > If anything, the names of the plugins themselves *could* be known. > > > > > > > > > > So ... if we are going to refactor the Codehaus codebase and > > > > > organisation, > > > > > let's do it to best match the future demands. > > > > > > > > > > I would also suggest being *very* clear about presenting the reason > > > > > that > > > > > the Codehaus/Mojo project develops Maven plugins instead of the > > > > > projects > > > > > themselves. > > > > > For example - it would seem apparent that the AspectJ project > should > > > > > develop an aspectj-maven-plugin. > > > > > However, that plugin is developed by Codehaus, and I believe that > we > > > > > should > > > > > be a bit clearer in documenting why. > > > > > > > > > > Fair? > > > > > > > > > > 2015-03-05 9:24 GMT+01:00 Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr>: > > > > > > Le mercredi 4 mars 2015 14:16:08 vous avez écrit : > > > > > > > *Project name* > > > > > > > May not be a concern, but that needs to be cleared out sooner > than > > > > > > > later. > > > > > > > I think that one of the most pressing subject may indeed not be > > > > > > > technical > > > > > > > but about the name of our project: what name should/could we > use > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > project. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Should/could it stay "'Codehaus Mojo" on GitHub even after > > > > > > > Codehaus > > > > > > > EOL > > > > > > > (meaning we'd certainly use https://github.com/codehaus-mojo > org)? > > > > > > > or > > > > > > > "Maven Mojo" (which would make googling for it quite difficult > > > > > > > btw)? > > > > > > > Or > > > > > > > change the project name even more? > > > > > > > > > > > > -1 to "Maven Mojo": trademark concern on Maven (Apache Maven, to > be > > > > > > precise) > > > > > > could be "Mojo for Maven" > > > > > > > > > > > > why not just "Mojo" as the project name? > > > > > > AFAIK, it has become a well known name lately: is there really a > > > > > > need > > > > > > for > > > > > > "XXX > > > > > > Mojo", whatever XXX is? > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Hervé > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > -- -- +==============================+ | Bästa hälsningar, | [sw. "Best regards"] | | Lennart Jörelid | EAI Architect & Integrator | | jGuru Europe AB | Mölnlycke - Kista | | Email: l...@jguru.se | URL: www.jguru.se | Phone | (skype): jgurueurope | (intl): +46 708 507 603 | (domestic): 0708 - 507 603 +==============================+
